Published January 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Assessment of CFD for unheated gas-liquid flows with high void fraction

  • 1. Canadian Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario (Canada)

Description

Highlights: • High void faction in horizontal pipe with bends were simulated using CFD. • ASME CFD best practice guidelines were used for performing the analyses. • CFD predictions were compared against a new in-house air-water experiment. - Abstract: Dispersed gas-liquid two-phase flows with high void fraction are commonly encountered in the nuclear and process industries. Detailed understanding of the fluid flow behavior under these conditions is imperative to reactor safety. Traditional modelling approaches (e.g. system thermalhydraulic codes) often use geometry specific correlations that limit their applicability. Canadian Nuclear Laboratories is systematically developing leading-edge CFD capabilities for applications to various reactor flows, including two-phase flows. In the present study, the existing turbulent momentum closures and bubble breakage/coalescence models were assessed for modeling the turbulent air-water flow in a horizontal pipe with two 90° bends. CFD predictions were compared against data from a new in-house air-water experiment that adopted an advanced wire-mesh sensor for the measurement of the void fraction distributions. An initial precursor CFD analysis for a simple pipe geometry was performed to determine the suitability and relative importance of interphase closures at the high void fraction range (15% ≤ αavg ≤ 30%); then a selected single set of interphase closures and breakage/coalescence kernels were applied to simulate three horizontal bend tests. The recommended procedure by ASME to determine discretization error was demonstrated through the Grid Convergence Index method. Fair agreement with measurements was obtained at the straight pipe section. Simulations qualitatively captured the kidney-bean shaped void distribution at the bend, but the location of the void peak value was offset by a minimum of 90° compared to the CNL measurements.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.11.016

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.11.016;
PII
S0029549318304783;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Journal Volume
341
Journal Page Range
p. 346-359
ISSN
0029-5493
CODEN
NEDEAU

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
51056452
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
CLOSURES; COALESCENCE; LIQUID FLOW; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; PIPES; REACTOR SAFETY; SIMULATION; TWO-PHASE FLOW; VOID FRACTION
Descriptors DEC
FLUID FLOW; INDUSTRY; SAFETY; TUBES

Optional Information

Notes
Crown Copyright © 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.