Published May 16, 1994
| Version v1
Journal article
Janzen, Wyss, and Schmeing reply
- 1. Department of Physics and Astronomy McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4M1 (Canada)
- 2. Manne Siegbahn Institute of Physics S-10405 Stockholm (Sweden)
- 3. AECL Research Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, K0J 1J0 (Canada)
Description
The authors point out that the two expressions for interaction strength Eqs.(1) and (2) in Ref.[1] have different ranges of applicability, and argue that Eq.(2) is more appropriate for the case presented in Ref.[2] and to respond to some claims of Ref.[1]
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Physical Review Letters
- Journal Volume
- 72
- Journal Issue
- 20
- Journal Page Range
- p. 3289.
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- CODEN
- PRLTAO
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 25060198
- Subject category
- S73: NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; S73: NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; S73: NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS;
- Descriptors DEI
- ANTIMONY 113; ENERGY SPECTRA; HAMILTONIANS; STRENGTH FUNCTIONS; WAVE FUNCTIONS; YRAST STATES; YTTERBIUM 168
- Descriptors DEC
- ANTIMONY ISOTOPES; BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; BETA-PLUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; ELECTRON CAPTURE RADIOISOTOPES; ENERGY LEVELS; EVEN-EVEN NUCLEI; FUNCTIONS; INTERMEDIATE MASS NUCLEI; ISOMERIC TRANSITION ISOTOPES; ISOTOPES; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; MINUTES LIVING RADIOISOTOPES; NANOSEC LIVING RADIOISOTOPES; NUCLEI; ODD-EVEN NUCLEI; QUANTUM OPERATORS; RADIOISOTOPES; RARE EARTH NUCLEI; SPECTRA; STABLE ISOTOPES; YTTERBIUM ISOTOPES