Published 1987 | Version v1
Book

Fusion-fission hybrid studies in the United States of America

  • 1. Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (USA)
  • 2. Grumman Aerospace Corp., Bethpage, NY (USA)
  • 3. GA Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA (USA)
  • 4. Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA)
  • 5. Princeton Univ., NJ (USA). Plasma Physics Lab.

Description

Systems and conceptual design studies have been carried out on the following three hybrid types: (1) The fission-suppressed hybrid, which maximizes fissile material produced (Pu or 233U) per unit of total nuclear power by suppressing the fission process and multiplying neutrons by (n,2n) reactions in materials like beryllium. (2) The fast-fission hybrid, which maximizes fissile material produced per unit of fusion power by maximizing fission of 238U (Pu is produced) in which twice the fissile atoms per unit of fusion power (but only a third per unit of nuclear power) are made. (3) The power hybrid, which amplifies power in the blanket for power production but does not produce fuel to sell. A series of studies led to a reference design of a fission-suppressed breeder that used liquid-lithium cooling of beryllium balls with thorium snap rings. Another series of studies considered a fission-suppressed, helium-cooled, molten-salt breeder design. Safety improvements for use in fast-fission designs were also identified. Low-burnup metal balls, which can be drained out of the blanket to passively cooled holding tanks, would be used in several of the above design concepts. Blanket designs not requiring reprocessing, called direct enrichment, were also studied. Breeding blanket designs for tokamak and tandem-mirror configurations were based on liquid-lithium, water, and helium cooling. Solid (U, Th, LiA102, Li2O) and liquid breeders (Li, LiF+ThF4) were considered. Studies indicate that as the predicted cost of the fission-suppressed fusion plant drops from twice a light-water reactor's (LWR) cost, the calculated breakeven price of uranium from the fusion breeder drops from $100/pound. A fusion plant costing 1.5 times an LWR is calculated to produce fuel at an equivalent price of $70/pound. An overall conclusion is that the deployment of fusion technology can cap the price of uranium. 18 refs, 12 figs, 4 tabs

Part of:
Fusion reactor design and technology 1986. V. 1

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
IAEA.
Imprint Place
Vienna (Austria)
ISBN
92-0-131187-7
Imprint Title
Fusion reactor design and technology 1986
Imprint Pagination
599 p.
Series
Panel proceedings series.
Journal Page Range
v. 1 p. 527-548.

Conference

Title
4. technical committee meeting and workshop on fusion reactor design and technology.
Dates
26 May - 6 Jun 1986.
Place
Yalta (USSR).

INIS

Country of Publication
Austria
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
19010332
Subject category
S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
BREEDING BLANKETS; COOLANTS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HYBRID REACTORS; PLANNING; RESEARCH PROGRAMS; SPECIFICATIONS; TANDEM MIRRORS; TOKAMAK DEVICES; URANIUM RESERVES; USA
Descriptors DEC
CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC MIRRORS; NORTH AMERICA; OPEN PLASMA DEVICES; RESERVES; RESOURCES; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES

Optional Information

Contract/Grant/Project number
Contract W-7405-ENG-48
Secondary number(s)
IAEA-TC--392.3/33.