Published May 5, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Discrete particle model for convective AL2O3–water nanofluid around a triangular obstacle

  • 1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 91775-1111 (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
  • 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
  • 3. Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering Department, Clarkson University, Potsdam NY 13699 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • The discrete particle model was more accurate than the single phase approach. • The effects of Brownian force on heat transfer are stronger than thermophoretic. • The concentration drops at absorbing walls. • For reflecting wall, the concentration increases. - Abstract: In this paper, the discrete particle model was used to determine the concentration distribution and particle trajectories in a nanofluid flowing around a triangular obstacle. Furthermore, the local and average Nusselt numbers and the phase diagrams of drag and lift coefficients were evaluated and discussed. Simulations were performed for two orientations of the triangular obstacle (side and vertex facing flows) and two different boundary conditions of reflect and trap for particle phase at the obstacle walls. Two-dimensional unsteady conservation laws of mass, momentum, and energy along with the equation of nanoparticle motion were used in the analysis. Numerical simulations of fluid flow and nanoparticle motions were conducted using the finite volume and trajectory analysis approaches. The simulation and model in this manuscript are developed using the commercial software Ansys-Fluent. The results were presented for a range of Reynolds number from 50 to 200 and for particle volume fractions (concentrations) from 0% to 5%. Finally, the predictions of the present discrete particle model are compared with those of the earlier effective single phase model. Comparison of the simulation results with the available experimental data revealed that the discrete particle model was more accurate than the effective single phase approach. The present discrete phase model showed that particle concentration near the walls was not uniform. In fact, the concentration dropped sharply at a thin boundary layer near the absorbing walls, while for reflecting wall the concentration increased slightly.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.01.076

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.01.076;
PII
S1359-4311(16)30026-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Thermal Engineering
Journal Volume
100
Journal Issue
Complete
Journal Page Range
p. 39-54
ISSN
1359-4311
CODEN
ATENFT

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.