Published April 22, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Hadronic vacuum polarization: Comparing lattice QCD and data-driven results in systematically improvable ways

  • 1. IJCLab, Université Paris-Saclay et CNRS/IN2P3, F-91405 Orsay, France
  • 2. Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
  • 3. Department of Physics, University of Wuppertal, D-42119 Wuppertal, Germany
  • 4. Institute for Theoretical Physics, Eötvös University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
  • 5. Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52428 Jülich, Germany
  • 6. Aix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, CPT, IPhU, Marseille, France
  • 7. LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, 75252, France

Description

The precision with which hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) is obtained determines how accurately important observables, such as the muon anomalous magnetic moment aμ or the low-energy running of the electromagnetic coupling α, are predicted. The two most precise approaches for determining HVP are dispersive relations combined with e+ehadrons cross section data and lattice QCD. However, the results obtained in these two approaches display significant tensions, whose origins are not understood. Here we present a framework that sheds light on this issue and—if the two approaches can be reconciled—allows them to be combined. Via this framework, we test the hypothesis that the tensions can be explained by modifying the R-ratio in different intervals of center-of-mass energy s. As ingredients, we consider observables that have been precisely determined in both approaches. These are the leading hadronic contributions to aμ, to the so-called intermediate window observable, and to the running of α between spacelike virtualities 1 and 10GeV2 (for which only a preliminary lattice result exists). Our tests take into account all uncertainties and correlations, as well as uncertainties on uncertainties in the lattice results. For instance, using this framework we show that results obtained in the two approaches can be made to agree, for all three observables, by modifying the ρ peak in the experimental spectrum. More specifically, we show that this requires a common 5% increase in the contributions of the peak to each of the three observables. This result is robust against the presence or absence of the running of α in the comparison. However, such an increase is much larger than the uncertainties on the measured R-ratio. We also discuss a variety of generalizations of the methods used here, as well as the limits in the information that can be extracted from the R-ratio via a finite set of observables.

Files

10.1103_PhysRevD.109.076019.pdf

Files (1.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:99ba866436ea2336cf12e13ed6a1afac
1.2 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1103/PhysRevD.109.076019;
arXiv
arXiv:2308.04221;
Crossref Funder ID
10.13039/501100001665; 10.13039/100007586; 10.13039/501100022273; 10.13039/501100019692; 10.13039/501100003163;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Physical Review D
Journal Volume
109
Journal Issue
7
Journal Page Range
40 pgs.
ISSN
1089-4918

Optional Information

Contract/Grant/Project number
ANR-22-CE31-0011; AMX-18-ACE-005; ERC-MUON; NW21-024-A; BMBF-05P21PXFCA; 502275
Notes
Contact Email: laurent.lellouch@cnrs.fr; <a href="https://www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/lellouch">https://www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/∼lellouch</a>; Contact Email: malaescu@in2p3.fr; <a href="http://lpnhe.in2p3.fr/malaescu">http://lpnhe.in2p3.fr/malaescu</a>; Record automatically processed
Funding organization
Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Aix-Marseille Université; Gauss Centre for Supercomputing; Leibniz-Rechenzentrum; Forschungszentrum Jülich