There is a newer version of the record available.

Published December 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Uncertainty analysis of hydrological modeling in a tropical area using different algorithms

  • 1. University of Goettingen, Department of Cartography, GIS and Remote Sensing (Germany)
  • 2. Colorado State University (United States)
  • 3. Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry (HUAF), Hue University, Faculty of Land Resources and Agricultural Environment (FLRAE) (Viet Nam)

Description

Hydrological modeling outputs are subject to uncertainty resulting from different sources of errors (e.g., error in input data, model structure, and model parameters), making quantification of uncertainty in hydrological modeling imperative and meant to improve reliability of modeling results. The uncertainty analysis must solve difficulties in calibration of hydrological models, which further increase in areas with data scarcity. The purpose of this study is to apply four uncertainty analysis algorithms to a semi-distributed hydrological model, quantifying different source of uncertainties (especially parameter uncertainty) and evaluate their performance. In this study, the Soil and Water Assessment Tools (SWAT) eco-hydrological model was implemented for the watershed in the center of Vietnam. The sensitivity of parameters was analyzed, and the model was calibrated. The uncertainty analysis for the hydrological model was conducted based on four algorithms: Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE), Sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI), Parameter Solution method (ParaSol) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The performance of the algorithms was compared using P-factor and Rfactor, coefficient of determination (R2), the Nash Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (NSE) and Percent Bias (PBIAS). The results showed the high performance of SUFI and PSO with P-factor>0.83, R-factor <0.56 and R2>0.91, NSE>0.89, and 0.18<PBIAS<0.32. Hence, we would suggest to use SUFI-2 initially to set the parameter ranges, and further use PSO for final analysis. Indeed, the uncertainty analysis must be accounted when the outcomes of the model use for policy or management decisions.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Frontiers of Earth Science (Print)
Journal Volume
12
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 661-671
ISSN
2095-0195

INIS

Country of Publication
China
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55019433
Subject category
S58: GEOSCIENCES; S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
ALGORITHMS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; OPTIMIZATION; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY; SOILS; WATERSHEDS
Descriptors DEC
GOVERNMENT POLICIES; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature