Insight into greenhouse gases emissions from the two popular treatment technologies in municipal wastewater treatment processes
Creators
- 1. Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NWS 2007 (Australia)
- 2. Department of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384 (China)
- 3. Joint Research Centre for Protective Infrastructure Technology and Environmental Green Bioprocess, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NWS 2007 (Australia)
- 4. Institution of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang (Viet Nam)
- 5. Department of Environmental Energy Engineering, Kyonggi University, 442-760 (Korea, Republic of)
- 6. Strategic Water Infrastructure Laboratory, School of Civil Mining and Environmental Engineering, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522 (Australia)
Description
Highlights: • Aerated zones significantly contribute to GHGEs in both AAO and SBR. • Higher emission was found in SBR than in AAO in terms of CO2, CH4 and N2O. • To quantify direct emissions with low uncertainty is essential for GHG controlling. • GHGEs impact factors help in establishing the rational control strategies. -- Abstract: Due to the impact of methane, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide on global warming, the quantity of these greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) has attracted more and more attention. Consequently, GHG emissions from the two popular treatment technologies: anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (AAO) process and sequencing batch reactor (SBR) should be properly identified and discussed toward the current situation in developing countries. Direct and indirect carbon dioxide (with and/or without including in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report) are all discussed in this article. This literature study observed that a quantity of total carbon dioxide emissions from SBR (374 g/m3 of wastewater) was double that of AAO whilst 10% of these was direct carbon dioxide. Methane emitted from an SBR was 0.50 g/m3 wastewater while 0.18 g CH4/m3 wastewater was released from an AAO. The level of nitrous oxide from AAO and SBR accounted for 0.97 g/m3 wastewater and 4.20 g/m3 wastewater, respectively. Although these results were collected from different WWTPs and where influent was in various states, GHGs emitted from both biological units and other treatment units in various processes are significant. The results also revealed that aerated zone is the major contributing factor in a wastewater treatment plant to the large amount of GHG emissions.
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.386;
- PII
- S0048969719313841;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Science of the Total Environment
- Journal Volume
- 671
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1302-1313
- ISSN
- 0048-9697
- CODEN
- STENDL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 55060462
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARBON DIOXIDE; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; GREENHOUSE GASES; METHANE; NITROUS OXIDE; WASTE WATER; WATER TREATMENT
- Descriptors DEC
- ALKANES; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; CLIMATIC CHANGE; HYDROCARBONS; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; LIQUID WASTES; NITROGEN COMPOUNDS; NITROGEN OXIDES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; WASTES; WATER
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.