Published 2013 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Estimating Alarm Thresholds for Process Monitoring Data under Different Assumptions about the Data Generating Mechanism

  • 1. Statistical Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
  • 2. Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

Description

Process monitoring (PM) for nuclear safeguards sometimes requires estimation of thresholds corresponding to small false alarm rates. Threshold estimation dates to the 1920s with the Shewhart control chart; however, because possible new roles for PM are being evaluated in nuclear safeguards, it is timely to consider modern model selection options in the context of threshold estimation. One of the possible new PM roles involves PM residuals, where a residual is defined as residual = data − prediction. This paper reviews alarm threshold estimation, introduces model selection options, and considers a range of assumptions regarding the data-generating mechanism for PM residuals. Two PM examples from nuclear safeguards are included to motivate the need for alarm threshold estimation. The first example involves mixtures of probability distributions that arise in solution monitoring, which is a common type of PM. The second example involves periodic partial cleanout of in-process inventory, leading to challenging structure in the time series of PM residuals.

Files

10.1155_2013_705878.pdf

Files (3.4 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:127ff31cd4b79de63e80bbe046ce6d63
3.4 MB Preview Download

System files (76.2 kB)

Name Size Download all

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1155/2013/705878;
Crossref Funder ID
10.13039/100006168;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Journal Volume
2013
Journal Page Range
1-18
ISSN
1687-6075

Optional Information

Copyright
© Author(s)
Notes
Record automatically processed
Funding organization
National Nuclear Security Administration, Materials Protection, Control and Accounting