Published February 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Energy security under de-carbonization scenarios: An assessment framework and evaluation under different technology and policy choices

  • 1. Central European University, Budapest (Hungary)
  • 2. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg (Austria)
  • 3. Lund University, Lund (Sweden)
  • 4. Graz University of Technology, Graz (Austria)

Description

How would a low-carbon energy transformation affect energy security? This paper proposes a framework to evaluate energy security under long-term energy scenarios generated by integrated assessment models. Energy security is defined as low vulnerability of vital energy systems, delineated along geographic and sectoral boundaries. The proposed framework considers vulnerability as a combination of risks associated with inter-regional energy trade and resilience reflected in energy intensity and diversity of energy sources and technologies. We apply this framework to 43 scenarios generated by the MESSAGE model as part of the Global Energy Assessment, including one baseline scenario and 42 'low-carbon' scenarios where the global mean temperature increase is limited to 2°C over the pre-industrial level. By and large, low-carbon scenarios are associated with lower energy trade and higher diversity of energy options, especially in the transport sector. A few risks do emerge under low-carbon scenarios in the latter half of the century. They include potentially high trade in natural gas and hydrogen and low diversity of electricity sources. Trade is typically lower in scenarios which emphasize demand-side policies as well as non-tradable energy sources (nuclear and renewables) while diversity is higher in scenarios which limit the penetration of intermittent renewables. - Highlights: • We explore energy security implications of long-term energy decarbonization scenarios. • We define energy security as low vulnerability of vital energy systems. • The trade-related risks are considerably lower in decarbonization scenarios. • Diversity of energy systems is generally higher in the first half of the century. • Vulnerability is lowest in scenarios with both high efficiency and renewable energy constraints

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.051

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.051;
PII
S0301-4215(13)01074-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
65
Journal Page Range
p. 743-760
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46063546
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
CLIMATIC CHANGE; DECARBONIZATION; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY SECURITY; ENERGY SYSTEMS; HAZARDS; HYDROGEN; LIMITING VALUES; NATURAL GAS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; TRADE; VULNERABILITY
Descriptors DEC
ELEMENTS; ENERGY SOURCES; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; NONMETALS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.