Published October 2010 | Version v1
Journal article

Renewable energy policy and public perceptions of renewable energy. A cultural theory approach

  • 1. School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Centre for Rural Policy Research, Department of Politics, Amory Building, Rennes Drive, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4RJ (United Kingdom)

Description

Public opposition to the siting of renewable energy (RE) facilities and public reluctance to invest in RE remain key obstacles to the expansion of the renewables sector in the UK and a number of other European countries. Although there is a growing body of qualitative research on factors that inform public attitudes towards RE, the majority of studies have tended to be quantitative and to view 'the public' and 'public opinion' as homogeneous wholes. This study uses a cultural theory framework and focus groups conducted in the South West UK to develop deeper understandings of how individuals' worldviews can inform opinions and behaviour in relation to RE. These findings are used to explore ways in which government policies on RE might be tailored to engender greater public support and participation. Issues discussed include the provision of economic incentives, information on climate change and RE, linking renewables to overall energy behaviour, and landscape aesthetics. (author)

Availability note (English)

Available from Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.024

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
38
Journal Issue
10
Journal Page Range
p. 5739-5748
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
United Kingdom
INIS RN
41120997
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
AESTHETICS; BEHAVIOR; CLIMATIC CHANGE; ENERGY POLICY; PUBLIC OPINION; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
Descriptors DEC
ENERGY SOURCES; GOVERNMENT POLICIES

Optional Information

Notes
Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved