Published June 1979
| Version v1
Journal article
Mitigating community impacts of energy development: some examples for coal and nuclear generating plants in the U.S
Description
Three mitigation plans aimed at internalizing community-level social costs are examined at the Tennessee Valley Authority four-unit nuclear plant in Hartsville, Tennessee; the Puget Sound Power and Light two-unit nuclear plant in Skagit, Washington; and the Missouri Basin Power Project three-unit coal plant in Wheatland, Wyoming. Viewed as new institutional responses to social impact mitigation planning, these plans are analyzed in terms of their origins, scope, goals, local participation, financing, and costs. The significance of the plans derives from: (1) their pioneer status; (2) their similarity of scope despite highly diverse regulatory environments; and (3) their custom tailoring to local circumstances
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Nucl. Technol.
- Journal Volume
- 44
- Journal Issue
- 1
- Series
- Nucl. Technol.
- Journal Page Range
- 132-140
- ISSN
- 0029-5450
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 10488047
- Subject category
- S21: SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS;
- Descriptors DEI
- ECONOMICS; FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS; HARTSVILLE-1 REACTOR; HARTSVILLE-2 REACTOR; HARTSVILLE-3 REACTOR; HARTSVILLE-4 REACTOR; SKAGIT-1 REACTOR; SKAGIT-2 REACTOR; SOCIOLOGY
- Descriptors DEC
- BWR TYPE REACTORS; ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS; POWER PLANTS; POWER REACTORS; REACTORS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; THERMAL REACTORS; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS