Published July 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Encouraging energy conservation at work: A field study testing social norm feedback and awareness of monitoring

  • 1. Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (United States)
  • 2. Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 (United States)
  • 3. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (United States)
  • 4. School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • Energy comparisons to peers resulted in significant energy savings from baseline. • Awareness of energy use ("Hawthorne Effect") did not result in energy savings. • Energy comparisons to peers encouraged participants to learn about their energy use. • Energy savings achieved with no financial incentives or intrinsic motivation. -- Abstract: The financial cost of personal energy consumption is substantial at the organizational level. Rarely do incentives for saving energy for the individual employee and organization align, making conservation a challenge. Here we perform a 12-week field experiment piloting two behavioral strategies: (1) social norms feedback and (2) awareness of energy monitoring, to encourage savings among 46 administrative staff at a university who were given the impression of participating in an energy quality study to reduce self-selection bias. Those in the social norms feedback condition used significantly less energy during the intervention (10% less energy) and follow up monitoring (11% less energy) phases compared to their baseline consumption. Moreover, these participants demonstrated that they learned more about their energy use than did those in the awareness monitoring condition. For policy makers and building mangers interested in the effectiveness of behavioral nudges in inducing energy savings, social norms feedback appears to be an effective energy savings nudge in an organizational setting where there are neither financial savings at-stake nor intrinsic motivation to conserve.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.028;
PII
S0301421519301922;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
130
Journal Page Range
p. 197-205
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55007336
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY QUALITY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES
Descriptors DEC
ENERGY ANALYSIS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.