Published August 1, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Experimental investigation of the confinement of d(3He,p)α and d(d,p)t fusion reaction products in JET

  • 1. Plasma Physics Department (LPP), ERM/KMS, Avenue Renaissance 30 B-1000 Brussels (Belgium)
  • 2. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM), Retieseweg 111, B-2440 Geel (Belgium)
  • 3. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig (Germany)
  • 4. INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, S.S. 17/bis km 18- 910, I-67100 Assergi (Italy)
  • 5. SCKCEN, Boeretang, B-2400 Mol (Belgium)
  • 6. Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM-Assoziation, D-85748 Garching (Germany)
  • 7. Association EURATOM/ENEA, Consorzio RFX, 4-35127 Padova (Italy)
  • 8. EURATOM/UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, OX14 3DB (United Kingdom)
  • 9. Association EURATOM-IPP.CR, CZ-182 21 Prague 8 (Czech Republic)
  • 10. Association EURATOM-Tekes, Aalto University, Department of Applied Physics, P.O. Box 4100, FI-00076 AALTO (Finland)
  • 11. Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM-Assoziation, Trilateral Euregio Cluster, D-52425 Jülich (Germany)

Description

In ITER, magnetic fusion will explore the burning plasma regime. Because such burning plasma is sustained by its own fusion reactions, alpha particles need to be confined (Hazeltine 2010 Fusion Eng. Des. 7–9 85). New experiments using d(3He,p)α and d(d,p)t fusion reaction products were performed in JET. Fusion product loss was measured from MHD-quiescent plasmas with a charged particle activation probe installed at a position opposite to the magnetic field ion gradient drift (see figure 1)—1.77 m above mid-plane—in the ceiling of JET tokamak. This new kind of escaping ion detector (Bonheure et al 2008 Fusion Sci. Technol. 53 806) provides for absolutely calibrated measurements. Both the mechanism and the magnitude of the loss are dealt with by this research. Careful analysis shows measured loss is in quantitative agreement with predictions from the classical orbit loss model. However, the comparison with simulated loss radial profile, although improved compared with previous studies in TFTR, Princeton, US (Zweben et al 2000 Nucl. Fusion 40 91), is not fully satisfactory and potential explanations for this discrepancy are examined. (paper)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/52/8/083004

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Fusion
Journal Volume
52
Journal Issue
8
Journal Page Range
[10 p.]
ISSN
0029-5515
CODEN
NUFUAU

Optional Information

Collaborations
JET-EFDA Contributors