Nodal status of malignant lymphoma in pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways: Comparison of integrated PET/CT with or without contrast enhancement
Creators
- 1. Division of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo (Japan)
- 2. Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
- 3. Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa (Japan)
Description
Aim: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of integrated contrast-enhanced positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT), as compared with non-contrasted PET/CT, in evaluating nodal status of malignant lymphoma in pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways. Materials and methods: Sixty-six patients (33 men and 33 women) with malignant lymphoma underwent staging with integrated CT and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) PET. Tumor types were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 26, 39%), follicular lymphoma (n = 20, 30%), Hodgkin disease (n = 16, 24%), and marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (n = 4, 6%). Both non-contrasted PET/CT and contrast-enhanced PET/CT images were examined separately by two different qualified physicians for each imaging modality, and nodal status of pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways was evaluated. Reference standard included follow-up with clinical, laboratory, and conventional CT findings. We compared diagnostic accuracy retrospectively on basis of per-patient and per-lesion analyses between two modalities using McNemar test, respectively. Results: Nodal status of pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways was more accurately determined on contrast-enhanced PET/CT (n = 52, 79%) compared with non-contrasted PET/CT (n = 47, 71%). Difference in the accuracy of nodal staging between non-contrasted PET/CT and contrast-enhanced PET/CT was significant (p = 0.048). On basis of per-lesion analysis, contrast-enhanced PET/CT determined more accurately the status of external iliac lymph node (p = 0.002), internal iliac lymph node (p < 0.0001), and common iliac lymph node (p = 0.002) compared with non-contrasted PET/CT. Diagnostic accuracies of paraaortic lymph node, aortocaval lymph node, and paracaval lymph node were similar by either non-contrasted PET/CT or contrast-enhanced PET/CT. Conclusion: Integrated contrast-enhanced PET/CT improves the diagnostic accuracy in evaluating nodal status of pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways in patients with malignant lymphoma
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.08.017Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.08.017;
- PII
- S0720-048X(07)00418-4;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Journal of Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 67
- Journal Issue
- 3
- Journal Page Range
- p. 508-513
- ISSN
- 0720-048X
- CODEN
- EJRADR
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 40002065
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FLUORINE 18; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE; IMAGE PROCESSING; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHOMAS; PATIENTS; POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
- Descriptors DEC
- ANTIMETABOLITES; BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; BETA-PLUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; DRUGS; EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FLUORINE ISOTOPES; HOURS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES; IMMUNE SYSTEM DISEASES; ISOMERIC TRANSITION ISOTOPES; ISOTOPES; LIGHT NUCLEI; LYMPHATIC SYSTEM; NANOSECONDS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEI; ODD-ODD NUCLEI; PROCESSING; RADIOISOTOPES; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2007 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.