Published October 2020 | Version v1
Journal article

Application of chest low-dose CT screening of Corona Virus Disease 2019 with a third-generation dual-source scanner

  • 1. Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan (China)
  • 2. Imaging Center, Wuhan Children's Hospital ( Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan (China)

Description

Objective: To investigate the application value of third-generation dual-source CT (3-G DSCT) low-dose scan mode combined with iterative reconstruction technology in the screening of COVID-19 and to evaluate the radiation dose. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients suspected of COVID-19 from December 2019 to February 2020 were retrospectively analysed and randomly divided into two groups (test group and conventional group, 60 patients in each). The parameters for test group included 3-G DSCT, Turbo Flash scan mode, CARE kV, with reference 90 kV, pitch 2.0, and ADMIRE algorithm, while those parameters for conventional group included the 128-slice CT, conventional spiral scan mode, 120 kV, pitch 1.2, and FBP algorithm. The CT values of aorta, spinal posterior muscle, and subcutaneous fat, the aortic noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast noise ratio (CNR) were compared to evaluate the image quality between two groups. Two experienced doctors scored the image quality using a double-blind method, and compared the CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP), and effective dose (E) of the two groups. Results: The CT value of the aorta and spinal posterior muscle and the aortic SNR in the test group were (45.38 ± 4.77), (53.41 ± 8.44) HU, and 2.82 ± 0.59, and significantly higher than those in the conventional group [(39.68 ± 6.26), (42.66 ± 6.32) HU, 2.58 ± 0.61, t = 5.608, 7.897, 2.162, P < 0.05]. The aortic noise, CNR and subjective scores between the two groups had no significant difference (P > 0.05). The CTDIvol, DLP, and E in the test group were (3.09 ± 1.02) mGy, (107.57 ± 32.81) mGy · cm, (1.51 ± 0.46) mSv, significantly lower than those in the conventional group [(7.00 ± 1.80) mGy, (261.65 ± 73.93) mGy · cm, (3.66 ± 1.03) mSv; t = -14.680, -14.756, -14.756, P < 0.05]. Conclusions: In the screening of COVID-19, using low-dose scanning mode of 3-G DSCT combined with iterative reconstruction technology would provide diagnostic quality images and meanwhile effectively reduce the radiation dose and improve the SNR of the image. (authors)

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
Journal Volume
40
Journal Issue
10
Journal Page Range
p. 783-788
ISSN
0254-5098

Optional Information

Notes
1 fig., 2 tabs., 18 refs.; http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2020.10.009