Published June 2004 | Version v1
Journal article

'Boomerang' technique: an improved method for conformal treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer

  • 1. Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, St Andrews Place, Melbourne, Victoria (Australia). Division of Radiation Oncology
  • 2. Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, St Andrews Place, Melbourne, Victoria (Australia) Dept. of Radiation Therapy Services
  • 3. Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, St Andrews Place, Melbourne, Victoria (Australia) Statistical Centre
  • 4. Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, St Andrews Place, Melbourne, Victoria (Australia) Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology

Description

The primary aim of the present study was to assess radiation dosimetry and subsequent clinical outcomes in patient: with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer using a novel radiation technique termed the 'Boomerang'. Dosimetric comparisons were made with both conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques. Thi; is a study of 22 patients treated with this technique from June 1995 to October 1998. The technique used entailec delivery of 36 Gy in 18 fractions via parallel opposed fields, then 24 Gy in 12 fractions via asymmetric rotating arc field' for a total of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Patients also received induction and concurrent chemotherapy. The radiation dosimetry was excellent. Dose-volume histograms showed that with the arc fields, 90% of the planning target volume received 94% of the prescribed dose. Relative to other conventional radiation therapy off-cord techniques, the Boomerang technique results in a 27% greater proportion of the prescribed dose being received by 90% of the planning target volume. This translates into an overall 10% greater dose received for the same prescribed dose. At 3 years, the actuarial loco-regional control rate, the failure-free survival rate and the overall survival rate were 91, 75 and 91%, respectively. At 5 years, the actuarial loco-regional control rate, the failure-free survival rate and the overall survival rate were 74, 62 and 71%, respectively. The Boomerang technique provided excellent radiation dosimetry with correspondingly good loco-regional control rates (in conjunction with chemotherapy) and very acceptable acute and late toxicity profiles. Because treatment can be delivered with conventional standard treatment planning and delivery systems, it is a validated treatment option for centres that do not have the capability or capacity for IMRT. A derivative of the Boomerang technique, excluding the parallel opposed component, is now our standard for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer when IMRT is not available Copyright (2004) Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Australasian Radiology
Journal Volume
48
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 170-180
ISSN
0004-8461
CODEN
AURDAW

Optional Information

Notes
33 refs., 5 figs., 7 tabs.