Published January 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Monte Carlo dose verification for a single-isocenter VMAT plan in multiple brain metastases

  • 1. Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kumamoto University, 4-24-1 Kuhonji, Kumamoto, 862-0976 (Japan)
  • 2. Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 4-24-1 Kuhonji, Kumamoto, 862-0976 (Japan)
  • 3. Varian Medical Systems, K.K. Kabutocho Heiwa Bldg. No.1, 5-1 Nihonbashi-Kabutocho Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-0026 (Japan)
  • 4. Ion Beam Therapy Center, SAGA HIMAT Foundation, 1-802-3, Hondori-machi, Tosu, Saga 841-0033 (Japan)

Description

The purpose of this study was to verify the accuracy of dose calculation algorithms of a treatment planning system for a single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan in multiple brain metastases, by comparing the dose distributions of treatment planning system with those of Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. We used a multitarget phantom containing 9 acrylic balls with a diameter of 15.9 mm inside a Lucy phantom measuring 17 × 17 × 17 cm3. Seven VMAT plans were created using the multitarget phantom: 1 multitarget plan (MTP) and 6 single target plans (STP). Three of the STP plans had a large jaw field setting, almost equivalent to that of the MTP, while the other plans had a jaw field setting fitted to each planning target volume. The isocenter for all VMAT plans was set to the center of the phantom. The VMAT dose distributions were calculated using the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) and were also recalculated through Acuros XB (AXB) and MC simulations under the same irradiation conditions. The AAA and AXB methods tended to overestimate dosage compared with the MC method in the MTP and in STPs with large jaw field settings. The dose distribution in single-isocenter VMAT plans for multiple brain metastases was influenced by jaw field settings. Finally, we concluded that MC-VMAT dose calculations are useful for 3D dose verification of single-isocenter VMAT plans for multiple brain metastases.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.meddos.2019.01.001;
PII
S095839471930010X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Medical Dosimetry
Journal Volume
44
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. e51-e58
ISSN
0958-3947

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55049971
Subject category
S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
Descriptors DEI
ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; PHANTOMS; PLANNING; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DOSES; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; MEDICINE; MOCKUP; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; SIMULATION; STRUCTURAL MODELS; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.