Published April 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

An empirical study on the basic human error probabilities for NPP advanced main control room operation using soft control

  • 1. Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 373-1, Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701 (Korea, Republic of)
  • 2. Department of Nuclear Engineering, Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research, P.O. Box 127788, Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates)
  • 3. Integrated Safety Assessment Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 150-1, Dukjin-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-353 (Korea, Republic of)

Description

Highlights: ► The operation environment of MCRs in NPPs has changed by adopting new HSIs. ► The operation action in NPP Advanced MCRs is performed by soft control. ► Different basic human error probabilities (BHEPs) should be considered. ► BHEPs in a soft control operation environment are investigated empirically. ► This work will be helpful to verify if soft control has positive or negative effects. -- Abstract: By adopting new human–system interfaces that are based on computer-based technologies, the operation environment of main control rooms (MCRs) in nuclear power plants (NPPs) has changed. The MCRs that include these digital and computer technologies, such as large display panels, computerized procedures, soft controls, and so on, are called Advanced MCRs. Among the many features in Advanced MCRs, soft controls are an important feature because the operation action in NPP Advanced MCRs is performed by soft control. Using soft controls such as mouse control, touch screens, and so on, operators can select a specific screen, then choose the controller, and finally manipulate the devices. However, because of the different interfaces between soft control and hardwired conventional type control, different basic human error probabilities (BHEPs) should be considered in the Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) for advanced MCRs. Although there are many HRA methods to assess human reliabilities, such as Technique for Human Error Rate Prediction (THERP), Accident Sequence Evaluation Program (ASEP), Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique (HEART), Human Event Repository and Analysis (HERA), Nuclear Computerized Library for Assessing Reactor Reliability (NUCLARR), Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM), and so on, these methods have been applied to conventional MCRs, and they do not consider the new features of advance MCRs such as soft controls. As a result, there is an insufficient database for assessing human reliabilities in advanced MCRs. In this paper, BHEPs in a soft control operation environment are investigated empirically for BHEPs to apply advanced MCRs. A soft control operation environment is constructed by using a compact nuclear simulator (CNS), which is a mockup for advanced MCRs. Before the experiments, all tasks that should be performed by subjects are analyzed using one of the task analysis methods, Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA). Human errors are then checked to analyze BHEPs, human error mode, and the cause of human error when using soft control

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.01.003

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.01.003;
PII
S0029-5493(13)00018-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Journal Volume
257
Journal Page Range
p. 79-87
ISSN
0029-5493
CODEN
NEDEAU

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
45056673
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING; S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
Descriptors DEI
CONTROL ROOMS; EQUIPMENT; ERRORS; EVALUATION; FORECASTING; HUMAN POPULATIONS; MOCKUP; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY; SIMULATORS
Descriptors DEC
ANALOG SYSTEMS; FUNCTIONAL MODELS; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POPULATIONS; POWER PLANTS; STRUCTURAL MODELS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.