Published May 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Tritium retention in W plasma-facing materials: Impact of the material structure and helium irradiation

  • 1. CEA Cadarache, IRFM, St Paul Les Durance (France)
  • 2. Natl Inst Fus Sci, Toki, Gifu (Japan)
  • 3. Univ Helsinki, Dept Phys, Helsinki (Finland)
  • 4. Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Energie and Klimaforsch Plasmaphys, Julich (Germany)
  • 5. CNRS, CEMHTI, Orleans (France)
  • 6. Max Planck Inst Plasma Phys, Garching (Germany)
  • 7. CEA Saclay, Saclay Tritium Lab, Gif Sur Yvette (France)
  • 8. Aix Marseille Univ, PIIM, CNRS, Marseille (France)
  • 9. Australia Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT (Australia)
  • 10. UCSD, Ctr Energy Res, La Jolla, CA (United States)
  • 11. Jozef Stefan Inst, Ljubljana (Slovenia)
  • 12. Kyushu Univ, Res Inst Appl Mech, Kasuga, Fukuoka (Japan)
  • 13. Natl Res Nucl Univ MEPhI, Moscow (Russian Federation)

Description

Plasma-facing materials for next generation fusion devices, like ITER and DEMO, will be submitted to intense fluxes of light elements, notably He and H isotopes (HI). Our study focuses on tritium (T) retention on a wide range of W samples: first, different types of W materials were investigated to distinguish the impact of the pristine original structure on the retention, from W-coated samples to ITER-grade pure W samples submitted to various annealing and manufacturing procedures, along with monocrystalline W for reference. Then, He and He-D irradiated W samples were studied to investigate the impact on He-damages such as nano-bubbles (exposures in LHD or PSI-2) on T retention. We exposed all the samples to tritium gas-loading using a gentle technique preventing any introduction of new damage in the material. Tritium desorption is measured by Liquid Scintillation counting (LSC) at ambient and high temperatures (800 degrees C). The remaining T inventory is then measured by sample full dissolution and LSC. Results on T inventory on He exposed samples highlighted that in all cases, tritium desorption as a gas (HT) increases significantly due to the formation of He damages. Up to 1.8 times more T can be trapped in the material through a competition of various mechanisms, but the major part of the inventory desorbs at room temperature, and so will most likely not take part to the long-term trapped inventory for safety and operational perspectives. Unfortunately, investigation of 'as received' industrial W (used for the making of plasma-facing materials) highlighted a strong impact of the pre existing defects on T retention: up to 2.5 times more T is trapped in 'as received W' compared to annealed and polish W, and desorbs only at 800 degrees C, meaning ideal W material studies may underestimate T inventory for tokamak relevant conditions. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nme.2019.03.005

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Materials and Energy
Journal Volume
19
Journal Page Range
p. 403-410
ISSN
2352-1791