Published May 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Metal mixtures in urban and rural populations in the US: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and the Strong Heart Study

  • 1. Departments of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205 (United States)
  • 2. Departments of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205 (United States)
  • 3. Institute of Chemistry -Analytical Chemistry, University of Graz, Graz 8010 (Austria)
  • 4. Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Washington, DC 20057 (United States)
  • 5. MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD 20782 (United States)
  • 6. Missouri Breaks Industries Research, Inc., Timber Lake, SD 57656 (United States)
  • 7. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205 (United States)
  • 8. Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205 (United States)

Description

Background: Natural and anthropogenic sources of metal exposure differ for urban and rural residents. We searched to identify patterns of metal mixtures which could suggest common environmental sources and/or metabolic pathways of different urinary metals, and compared metal-mixtures in two population-based studies from urban/sub-urban and rural/town areas in the US: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and the Strong Heart Study (SHS). Methods: We studied a random sample of 308 White, Black, Chinese-American, and Hispanic participants in MESA (2000–2002) and 277 American Indian participants in SHS (1998–2003). We used principal component analysis (PCA), cluster analysis (CA), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to evaluate nine urinary metals (antimony [Sb], arsenic [As], cadmium [Cd], lead [Pb], molybdenum [Mo], selenium [Se], tungsten [W], uranium [U] and zinc [Zn]). For arsenic, we used the sum of inorganic and methylated species (∑As). Results: All nine urinary metals were higher in SHS compared to MESA participants. PCA and CA revealed the same patterns in SHS, suggesting 4 distinct principal components (PC) or clusters (∑As-U-W, Pb-Sb, Cd-Zn, Mo-Se). In MESA, CA showed 2 large clusters (∑As-Mo-Sb-U-W, Cd-Pb-Se-Zn), while PCA showed 4 PCs (Sb-U-W, Pb-Se-Zn, Cd-Mo, ∑As). LDA indicated that ∑As, U, W, and Zn were the most discriminant variables distinguishing MESA and SHS participants. Conclusions: In SHS, the ∑As-U-W cluster and PC might reflect groundwater contamination in rural areas, and the Cd-Zn cluster and PC could reflect common sources from meat products or metabolic interactions. Among the metals assayed, ∑As, U, W and Zn differed the most between MESA and SHS, possibly reflecting disproportionate exposure from drinking water and perhaps food in rural Native communities compared to urban communities around the US. - Highlights: • We identified and compared environmental sources of urinary metals in MESA and SHS. • ∑As-U-W in SHS may reflect groundwater contamination in rural areas. • Cd-Zn in SHS may reflect common sources from meat products or metabolic interaction. • ∑As, U, W, and Zn differed the most between MESA and SHS participants.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.02.032

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.envres.2016.02.032;
PII
S0013-9351(16)30072-X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Research
Journal Volume
147
Journal Page Range
p. 356-364
ISSN
0013-9351
CODEN
ENVRAL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.