Published 1984
| Version v1
Journal article
Psychological health damage as an environmental effect: Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy
Creators
Description
The Supreme court took a narrow view of the term environmental in Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy when it stated that the purpose of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is to protect the physical environment. Psychological health damage caused by the perception of the risk of a nuclear accident is not an environmental effect cognizable under NEPA unless their is a demonstrable relationship. Litigants seeking the protection of NEPA must carefully examine the origin and nature of alleged psychological harms and frame their complains to establish a close relationship between a change in the physical environment and the alleged psychological harm
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Ariz. Law Rev.
- Journal Volume
- 26
- Journal Issue
- 2
- Series
- Ariz. Law Rev.
- Journal Page Range
- 497-505
- ISSN
- 0004-1831
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 16086439
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; HEALTH HAZARDS; LAWSUITS; LEGAL ASPECTS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; US NATL ENVIRONMENT POLICY ACT
- Descriptors DEC
- HAZARDS; LAW; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS