Published 1984 | Version v1
Journal article

Psychological health damage as an environmental effect: Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy

Creators

Description

The Supreme court took a narrow view of the term environmental in Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy when it stated that the purpose of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is to protect the physical environment. Psychological health damage caused by the perception of the risk of a nuclear accident is not an environmental effect cognizable under NEPA unless their is a demonstrable relationship. Litigants seeking the protection of NEPA must carefully examine the origin and nature of alleged psychological harms and frame their complains to establish a close relationship between a change in the physical environment and the alleged psychological harm

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Ariz. Law Rev.
Journal Volume
26
Journal Issue
2
Series
Ariz. Law Rev.
Journal Page Range
497-505
ISSN
0004-1831

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
16086439
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; HEALTH HAZARDS; LAWSUITS; LEGAL ASPECTS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; US NATL ENVIRONMENT POLICY ACT
Descriptors DEC
HAZARDS; LAW; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS