Published January 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Evaluation of the efficacy of the guideline on reading CT images of malignant pleural mesothelioma with reference CT films for improving the proficiency of radiologists

  • 1. Department of Environmental Health, School of Medicine University of Fukui, 23-3 Shimoaitsuki, Matsuoka, Eihezi-cho, Fukui Prefecture, 910-1193 (Japan)
  • 2. Department of Environmental Medicine, Kochi University School of Medicine (Japan)
  • 3. Central Chest Disease Institute of Thailand, 39 Moo 9, Tiwanon Road, Muang Nonthaburi, 11000 (Thailand)
  • 4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Radiooncology and Nuclear Medicine, Radiological Clinic, Miner's Hospital, Radiologische Klinik, Lansppaschaftskranhaus Dortmund, Wieckesweg 27, 44309, Dortmund (Germany)
  • 5. Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, 1180 Nagasone-cho, Kita-ku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8555 (Japan)
  • 6. Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Fukui, 23-3 Shimoaitsuki Matsuoka, Eiheizi-cho, Fukui Prefecture, 910-1193 (Japan)

Description

Purpose: To assess the efficacy of the developed guideline on reading CT images of malignant pleural mesothelioma for improving radiologists' reading proficiency. Materials and Methods: Three radiologists independently read the CT films of 22 cases including definite mesothelioma and non-mesothelioma cases at two times before and after studying the malignant pleural mesothelioma CT Guideline. The sensitivity and specificity for mesothelioma were calculated and compared between the 1st and 2nd trials. The kappa statistics was examined for agreement with experts for mesothelioma probability and for mesothelioma features recorded by three radiologists. Results: After studying the mesothelioma CT Guideline, the sensitivity for mesothelioma shown by the three radiologists at the 2nd trial was 100%, 100% and 80%, which were higher than 80%, 85% and 60% at the 1st trial, respectively. The average kappa for agreement between radiologists and experts on dichotomized mesothelioma probability were 0.69 (good) at the 2nd trial vs. 0.38 (fair) at the 1st trial. The average kappa for the agreement with experts for each of 7 features by three radiologists were 0.52–0.80 at the 2nd trial, which were significantly higher than 0.34–0.58 at the 1st trial (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test: P < 0.01), and as to five features "unilateral pleural effusion", "nodular pleural thickening", "tumoral encasement of lung", "mediastinal pleural thickening", and "diminished lung", they achieved good agreement with average kappa of 0.61–0.80. Conclusion: The developed mesothelioma CT Guideline was suggested to have substantial effect in improving the radiologists' proficiency for reading CT images of mesothelioma, and may contribute to accurate diagnosis of mesothelioma

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.05.022

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.05.022;
PII
S0720-048X(12)00251-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
82
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 169-176
ISSN
0720-048X
CODEN
EJRADR

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
Cuba
INIS RN
46001222
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CAT SCANNING; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DIAGNOSIS; FILMS; PROBABILITY; SENSITIVITY; SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS
Descriptors DEC
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; EVALUATION; MATHEMATICS; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.