Published January 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Factors in low-carbon energy transformations: Comparing nuclear and bioenergy in Brazil, Sweden, and the United States

  • 1. Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 5825 University Research Court, Ste 3500, College Park, MD 20740 (United States)
  • 2. University of Maryland, School of Public Policy, 2101 Van Munching Hall, College Park, MD 20742 (United States)

Description

Policies to address climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions might be made more effective if we can better understand the pathways by which transformative technologies become significant components of energy systems. Indeed, the central question of mitigation revolves around the scope of policy to influence or accelerate the diffusion of low-carbon technology. While market forces clearly influence technology deployment, understanding the longer-term and large-scale changes in the energy system requires a broader understanding of the relative influence of institutional, behavioral, and social factors. This paper presents the results of an interview-based, comparative case approach to investigating systematically the relative importance of these non-economic factors influencing technological change across technology and country contexts. We identified two low-carbon energy sectors (bioenergy and nuclear power) that underwent significant changes over the past 50 years in the energy portfolio of three countries: Brazil, Sweden, and the United States. We identified nine categories of factors that might contribute to these large technological transformations, and then evaluated, via interviews with sector participants in each country, which factors were viewed as being determinative or highly influential in the trajectory of that technology in their country context. We also draw out policy implications and directions for future research. - Highlights: ► Study of energy transformations in bioenergy and nuclear energy in Brazil, Sweden, and the US. ► Data include survey and 78 interviews across 3 countries and 2 sectors. ► Across all countries and sectors, domestic policy was seen as the major factor in transitions. ► Other key factors with more variance were technological characteristics and industry structure. ► Study adds empirical detail to understanding of relative weights of factors in energy transitions.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.064

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.064;
PII
S0301-4215(11)00682-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
40
Journal Page Range
p. 131-146
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

Conference

Title
Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research
Acronym
International research conference on strategic choices for renewable energy investment
Dates
Feb 2010
Place
St. Gallen (Switzerland)

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
43076971
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
BRAZIL; CARBON; CLIMATES; CLIMATIC CHANGE; ECONOMIC POLICY; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE GASES; INDUSTRY; MARKET; MITIGATION; NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR POWER; SWEDEN; USA
Descriptors DEC
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ELEMENTS; ENERGY; EUROPE; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; LATIN AMERICA; NONMETALS; NORTH AMERICA; POWER; SCANDINAVIA; SOUTH AMERICA; WESTERN EUROPE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.