Factors in low-carbon energy transformations: Comparing nuclear and bioenergy in Brazil, Sweden, and the United States
Creators
- 1. Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 5825 University Research Court, Ste 3500, College Park, MD 20740 (United States)
- 2. University of Maryland, School of Public Policy, 2101 Van Munching Hall, College Park, MD 20742 (United States)
Description
Policies to address climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions might be made more effective if we can better understand the pathways by which transformative technologies become significant components of energy systems. Indeed, the central question of mitigation revolves around the scope of policy to influence or accelerate the diffusion of low-carbon technology. While market forces clearly influence technology deployment, understanding the longer-term and large-scale changes in the energy system requires a broader understanding of the relative influence of institutional, behavioral, and social factors. This paper presents the results of an interview-based, comparative case approach to investigating systematically the relative importance of these non-economic factors influencing technological change across technology and country contexts. We identified two low-carbon energy sectors (bioenergy and nuclear power) that underwent significant changes over the past 50 years in the energy portfolio of three countries: Brazil, Sweden, and the United States. We identified nine categories of factors that might contribute to these large technological transformations, and then evaluated, via interviews with sector participants in each country, which factors were viewed as being determinative or highly influential in the trajectory of that technology in their country context. We also draw out policy implications and directions for future research. - Highlights: ► Study of energy transformations in bioenergy and nuclear energy in Brazil, Sweden, and the US. ► Data include survey and 78 interviews across 3 countries and 2 sectors. ► Across all countries and sectors, domestic policy was seen as the major factor in transitions. ► Other key factors with more variance were technological characteristics and industry structure. ► Study adds empirical detail to understanding of relative weights of factors in energy transitions.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.064Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.064;
- PII
- S0301-4215(11)00682-3;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 40
- Journal Page Range
- p. 131-146
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
Conference
- Title
- Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research
- Acronym
- International research conference on strategic choices for renewable energy investment
- Dates
- Feb 2010
- Place
- St. Gallen (Switzerland)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 43076971
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- BRAZIL; CARBON; CLIMATES; CLIMATIC CHANGE; ECONOMIC POLICY; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE GASES; INDUSTRY; MARKET; MITIGATION; NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR POWER; SWEDEN; USA
- Descriptors DEC
- DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ELEMENTS; ENERGY; EUROPE; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; LATIN AMERICA; NONMETALS; NORTH AMERICA; POWER; SCANDINAVIA; SOUTH AMERICA; WESTERN EUROPE
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.