Published October 1, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Empowering Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Through Physics and Technology: An Overview

  • 1. Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (United States)
  • 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York (United States)
  • 3. Varian Medical Systems and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California (United States)

Description

Considering the clinical potential of protons attributable to their physical characteristics, interest in proton therapy has increased greatly in this century, as has the number of proton therapy installations. Until recently, passively scattered proton therapy was used almost entirely. Notably, the overall clinical results to date have not shown a convincing benefit of protons over photons. A rapid transition is now occurring with the implementation of the most advanced form of proton therapy, intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). IMPT is superior to passively scattered proton therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetrically. However, numerous limitations exist in the present IMPT methods. In particular, compared with IMRT, IMPT is highly vulnerable to various uncertainties. In this overview we identify three major areas of current limitations of IMPT: treatment planning, treatment delivery, and motion management, and discuss current and future efforts for improvement. For treatment planning, we need to reduce uncertainties in proton range and in computed dose distributions, improve robust planning and optimization, enhance adaptive treatment planning and delivery, and consider how to exploit the variability in the relative biological effectiveness of protons for clinical benefit. The quality of proton therapy also depends on the characteristics of the IMPT delivery systems and image guidance. Efforts are needed to optimize the beamlet spot size for both improved dose conformality and faster delivery. For the latter, faster energy switching time and increased dose rate are also needed. Real-time in-room volumetric imaging for guiding IMPT is in its early stages with cone beam computed tomography (CT) and CT-on-rails, and continued improvements are anticipated. In addition, imaging of the proton beams themselves, using, for instance, prompt γ emissions, is being developed to determine the proton range and to reduce range uncertainty. With the realization of the advances described above, we posit that IMPT, thus empowered, will lead to substantially improved clinical results.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.005

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.005;
PII
S0360-3016(17)30902-1;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
99
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 304-316
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49073825
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE PROCESSING; PROTON BEAMS; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY
Descriptors DEC
BEAMS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DOSES; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; NUCLEON BEAMS; PARTICLE BEAMS; PROCESSING; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.