There is a newer version of the record available.

Published January 21, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article

Pain Control in Breast Surgery: Survey of Current Practice and Recommendations for Optimizing Management—American Society of Breast Surgeons Opioid/Pain Control Workgroup

  • 1. New York Presbyterian. Columbia University Irving Medical Center (United States)
  • 2. Anne Arundel Medical Center (United States)
  • 3. The University of Ilinois College of Medicine (United States)
  • 4. University of Virginia (United States)
  • 5. Prisma Health (United States)
  • 6. Duke University Medical Center (United States)
  • 7. Oasis MD (United States)
  • 8. Maryland Surgeons (United States)
  • 9. Indiana University School of Medicine (United States)
  • 10. Scripps Health (United States)
  • 11. Miami Cancer Institute (United States)
  • 12. The University of Vermont (United States)
  • 13. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine (United States)
  • 14. Trihealth Cancer Institute (United States)
  • 15. University of California San Diego (United States)
  • 16. Grand View Health (United States)
  • 17. Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates)
  • 18. Harvard Medical School/Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (United States)
  • 19. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (United States)

Description

Introduction

: The opioid epidemic in the United States is a public health crisis. Breast surgeons are obligated to provide good pain control for their patients after surgery but also must minimize administration of narcotics to prevent a surgical episode of care from becoming a patient's gateway into opioid dependence.

Methods

: A survey to ascertain pain management practice patterns after breast surgery was performed. A review of currently available literature that was specific to breast surgery was performed to create recommendations regarding pain management strategies.

Results

: A total of 609 surgeons completed the survey and demonstrated significant variations in pain management practices, specifically within regards to utilization of regional anesthesia (e.g., nerve blocks), and quantity of prescribed narcotics. There is excellent data to guide the use of local and regional anesthesia. There are, however, fewer studies to guide narcotic recommendations; thus, these recommendations were guided by prevailing practice patterns.

Conclusions

: Pain management practices after breast surgery have significant variation and represent an opportunity to improve patient safety and quality of care. Multimodality approaches in conjunction with standardized quantities of narcotics are recommended.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Annals of Surgical Oncology (Online)
Journal Volume
27
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 985-990
ISSN
1534-4681

INIS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 © Society of Surgical Oncology 2020