Published 2022 | Version v1
Journal article

Imaging of treatment response and minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. State of the art WB-MRI and PET/CT

  • 1. Radiology Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Hippocrate Avenue 10, 1200, Brussels (Belgium)
  • 2. Haematology Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), 1200, Brussels (Belgium)
  • 3. Radiology Department, Universiteit Ghent, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 33, 9000, Gent (Belgium)
  • 4. Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Avenue du Laerbeek 101, 1090, Jette (Belgium)
  • 5. Departement of Medicine, Myeloma Unit, Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY (United States)
  • 6. Radiology Department, Katholieke Univesiteit Leuven, Oude Markt, 13, 3000, Leuven (Belgium)
  • 7. Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200, Brussels (Belgium)

Description

Bone imaging has been intimately associated with the diagnosis and staging of multiple myeloma (MM) for more than 5 decades, as the presence of bone lesions indicates advanced disease and dictates treatment initiation. The methods used have been evolving, and the historical radiographic skeletal survey has been replaced by whole body CT, whole body MRI (WB-MRI) and [18F]FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone marrow lesions and less frequent extramedullary plasmacytomas. Beyond diagnosis, imaging methods are expected to provide the clinician with evaluation of the response to treatment. Imaging techniques are consistently challenged as treatments become more and more efficient, inducing profound response, with more subtle residual disease. WB-MRI and FDG-PET/CT are the methods of choice to address these challenges, being able to assess disease progression or response and to detect ''minimal'' residual disease, providing key prognostic information and guiding necessary change of treatment. This paper provides an up-to-date overview of the WB-MRI and PET/CT techniques, their observations in responsive and progressive disease and their role and limitations in capturing minimal residual disease. It reviews trials assessing these techniques for response evaluation, points out the limited comparisons between both methods and highlights their complementarity with most recent molecular methods (next-generation flow cytometry, next-generation sequencing) to detect minimal residual disease. It underlines the important role of PET/MRI technology as a research tool to compare the effectiveness and complementarity of both methods to address the key clinical questions.

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03841-5

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Skeletal Radiology
Journal Volume
51
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 59-80
ISSN
0364-2348
CODEN
SKRADI