Published April 1, 2006 | Version v1
Journal article

Radiotherapy in pediatric medulloblastoma: Quality assessment of Pediatric Oncology Group Trial 9031

  • 1. Quality Assurance Review Committee, Providence, RI (United States) and Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Geneva (Switzerland)
  • 2. Quality Assurance Review Committee, Providence, RI (United States)
  • 3. Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Division, Duke South Hospital, Durham, NC (United States)
  • 4. Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY (United States)
  • 5. Operations Center, Children's Oncology Group, Arcadia, CA (United States)
  • 6. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (United States)
  • 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN (United States)
  • 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (United States)

Description

Purpose: To evaluate the potential influence of radiotherapy quality on survival in high-risk pediatric medulloblastoma patients. Methods and Materials: Trial 9031 of the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) aimed to study the relative benefit of cisplatin and etoposide randomization of high-risk patients with medulloblastoma to preradiotherapy vs. postradiotherapy treatment. Two-hundred and ten patients were treated according to protocol guidelines and were eligible for the present analysis. Treatment volume (whole brain, spine, posterior fossa, and primary tumor bed) and dose prescription deviations were assessed for each patient. An analysis of first site of failure was undertaken. Event-free and overall survival rates were calculated. A log-rank test was used to determine the significance of potential survival differences between patients with and without major deviations in the radiotherapy procedure. Results: Of 160 patients who were fully evaluable for all treatment quality parameters, 91 (57%) had 1 or more major deviations in their treatment schedule. Major deviations by treatment site were brain (26%), spinal (7%), posterior fossa (40%), and primary tumor bed (17%). Major treatment volume or total dose deviations did not significantly influence overall and event-free survival. Conclusions: Despite major treatment deviations in more than half of fully evaluable patients, underdosage or treatment volume misses were not associated with a worse event-free or overall survival

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.002;
PII
S0360-3016(05)02868-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
64
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 1325-1330
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
37095053
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BRAIN; FAILURES; HAZARDS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY; RECOMMENDATIONS; VERTEBRAE
Descriptors DEC
BODY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DISEASES; MEDICINE; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; SKELETON; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2006 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.