Published November 1, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Multi-objective optimization of a sugarcane biorefinery for integrated ethanol and methanol production

  • 1. School of Food Engineering, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Rua Monteiro Lobato, 80 - CEP, 13083-862, Campinas (Brazil)
  • 2. Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129, Torino (Italy)
  • 3. Ecole Polytechnique Federal de Lausanne, STI-IGM-IPESE, Station 9, 1015, Lausanne (Switzerland)
  • 4. Center of Engineering, Modeling and Social Sciences (CECS), Federal University of ABC (UFABC), Avenida dos Estados, 5001- CEP, 09210-580, Santo André (Brazil)

Description

The present study evaluates a sugarcane biorefinery producing ethanol through juice fermentation and methanol via gasification of sugarcane lignocellulosic residues and liquid fuel synthesis. Two technologies of gasification named entrained flow and circulating fluidized bed are compared. Flowsheet modeling and thermo-economic analysis methods are applied, followed by a multi-objective optimization based on a genetic algorithm. The optimum Ethanol–Methanol biorefinery design options are compared with other previously studied sugarcane biorefineries. The results show that the biorefinery's energy efficiency increases significantly with the integration of a methanol production plant in a conventional ethanol distillery. The configuration using an entrained flow gasifier presents lower conversion efficiency than the one using a circulating fluidized bed gasifier. However, for the entrained flow gasifier configuration, the size of the methanol production process could be bigger since more heat is available for the ethanol process favouring the integration with the ethanol plant. Higher energy efficiency due to increase of methanol production leads to a higher total investment for both gasification technologies. The cost analysis shows that the calculated methanol production cost is 30% higher than its current market price. Environmental incentives for biofuels could change this scenario but are not in the scope of this study. - Highlights: • A sugarcane biorefinery producing methanol and ethanol was investigated. • Sugarcane bagasse was gasified and syngas was converted to methanol. • The EF gasifier presented better thermal integration with the biorefinery. • Methanol production cost at the biorefinery is higher than the market price.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.104

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.104;
PII
S0360-5442(15)00860-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy (Oxford)
Journal Volume
138
Journal Issue
Complete
Journal Page Range
p. 1281-1290
ISSN
0360-5442
CODEN
ENEYDS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.