Published February 2014 | Version v1
Report Restricted

Durability test of geomembrane liners presumed to avail near surface disposal facilities for low-level waste generated from research, industrial and medical facilities

  • 1. Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Low-level Radioactive Waste Disposal Project Center, Tokai, Ibaraki (Japan)
  • 2. S.B.Research Co., Ltd., Utsunomiya, Tochigi (Japan)

Description

The Low-level Radioactive Waste Disposal Project Center will construct near surface disposal facilities for radioactive wastes from research, industrial and medical facilities. The disposal facilities consist of "concrete pit type" for low-level radioactive wastes and "trench type" for very low level radioactive wastes. As for the trench type disposal facility, two kinds of facility designs are on projects – one for a normal trench type disposal facility without any of engineered barriers and the other for a trench type disposal facility with geomembrane liners that could prevent from causing environmental effects of non radioactive toxic materials contained in the waste packages. The disposal facility should be designed taking basic properties of durability on geomembrane liners into account, for it is exposed to natural environment on a long-term basis. This study examined mechanical strength and permeability properties to assess the durability on the basis of an indoor accelerated exposure experiment targeting the liner materials presumed to avail the conceptual design so far. Its results will be used for the basic and detailed design henceforth by confirming the empirical degradation characteristic with the progress of the exposure time. (author)

Availability note (English)

Available from JAEA; DOI: https://doi.org/10.11484/jaea-technology-2013-036

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

System files (102.9 kB)

Name Size Download all

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Pagination
58 p.
Report number
JAEA-Technology--2013-036

Optional Information

Notes
5 refs., 34 figs., 29 tabs.