Published June 1, 2001 | Version v1
Journal article

The bridge from cold facts and hot rhetoric to rational climate policy

Creators

  • 1. American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L St., NW, 20005 Washington, DC (United States)

Description

The scientific community must expand its role in the political debate over climate change if we are to have wise and smart policies. The current debate is characterized by a cacaphony of competing scientific claims, scare tactics and propaganda. Scientists, particularly those in academia, are badly needed to uphold the principles of scientific inquiry and standards of evidence, upon which rational public policy depends. They should weigh into the conflict heavily, when the bounds of -rational analysis are exceeded. The acid test of analytical rigor must remain a first principle

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Fuel Processing Technology
Journal Volume
71
Journal Issue
1-3
Journal Page Range
p. 131-137
ISSN
0378-3820
CODEN
FPTEDY

Conference

Title
Fuel science in the year 2000. Where do we stand and where do we go from here?
Dates
26 Mar 2000
Place
San Francisco, CA (United States)

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
Netherlands
INIS RN
32045849
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
CLIMATIC CHANGE; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; POLITICAL ASPECTS; PUBLIC OPINION
Descriptors DEC
GOVERNMENT POLICIES; INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS