Published June 1, 2001
| Version v1
Journal article
The bridge from cold facts and hot rhetoric to rational climate policy
Creators
- 1. American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L St., NW, 20005 Washington, DC (United States)
Description
The scientific community must expand its role in the political debate over climate change if we are to have wise and smart policies. The current debate is characterized by a cacaphony of competing scientific claims, scare tactics and propaganda. Scientists, particularly those in academia, are badly needed to uphold the principles of scientific inquiry and standards of evidence, upon which rational public policy depends. They should weigh into the conflict heavily, when the bounds of -rational analysis are exceeded. The acid test of analytical rigor must remain a first principle
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Fuel Processing Technology
- Journal Volume
- 71
- Journal Issue
- 1-3
- Journal Page Range
- p. 131-137
- ISSN
- 0378-3820
- CODEN
- FPTEDY
Conference
- Title
- Fuel science in the year 2000. Where do we stand and where do we go from here?
- Dates
- 26 Mar 2000
- Place
- San Francisco, CA (United States)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- Netherlands
- INIS RN
- 32045849
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- CLIMATIC CHANGE; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; POLITICAL ASPECTS; PUBLIC OPINION
- Descriptors DEC
- GOVERNMENT POLICIES; INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS