Comprehensive analysis and parametric optimization of a CCP (combined cooling and power) system driven by geothermal source
- 1. Institute of Turbomachinery, State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049 (China)
- 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 (United States)
Description
A CCP (combined cooling and power) system, which integrated a flash-binary power generation system with a bottom combined cooling and power subsystem operating through the combination of an organic Rankine cycle and an ejector refrigeration cycle, was developed to utilize geothermal energy. Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses were performed on the system. A performance indicator, namely the average levelized costs per unit of exergy products for the overall system, was developed to assess the exergoeconomic performance of the system. The effects of four key parameters including flash pressure, pinch point temperature difference in the vapor generator, inlet pressure and back pressure of the ORC turbine on the system performance were evaluated through a parametric analysis. Two single-objective optimizations were conducted to reach the maximum exergy efficiency and the minimum average levelized costs per unit of exergy products for the overall system, respectively. The optimization results implied that the most exergoeconomically effective system couldn't obtain the best system thermodynamic performance and vice versa. An exergy analysis based on the thermodynamic optimization result revealed that the biggest exergy destruction occurred in the vapor generator and the next two largest exergy destruction were respectively caused by the steam turbine and the flashing device. - Highlights: • A CCP (combined cooling and power) system driven by geothermal source is developed. • Levelized costs per unit of exergy product is used as the exergoeconomic indicator. • Parametric analyses are performed from thermodynamic and exergoeconomic viewpoints. • The optimal exergoeconomic design cannot obtain the best thermodynamic performance. • Exergy analysis is carried out based on the thermodynamic optimization result.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.003Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.003;
- PII
- S0360-5442(16)00013-X;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy (Oxford)
- Journal Volume
- 97
- Journal Page Range
- p. 470-487
- ISSN
- 0360-5442
- CODEN
- ENEYDS
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48003943
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- COST; DESIGN; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; EXERGY; GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; INDICATORS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; POWER GENERATION; POWER SYSTEMS; RANKINE CYCLE; REFRIGERATION; STEAM TURBINES; THERMODYNAMICS; VAPOR GENERATORS; VAPORS
- Descriptors DEC
- BOILERS; COOLING; EFFICIENCY; ENERGY; ENERGY SOURCES; ENERGY SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT; FLUIDS; GASES; MACHINERY; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES; TURBINES; TURBOMACHINERY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.