Published 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

A study to determine the differences between the displayed dose values for two full-field digital mammography units and values calculated using a range of Monte-Carlo-based techniques: A phantom study

  • 1. Medical Imaging Dept., Mater Dei Hospital, Tal-Qroqq, Msida MSD2090 (Malta)
  • 2. Radiological Protection Centre, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London SW17 0QT (United Kingdom)
  • 3. Dept. of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Univ. College London, London WC1E 6BT (United Kingdom)

Description

Modern full-field digital mammography (FFDM) units display the mean glandular dose (MGD) and the entrance or incident air kerma (K) to the breast following each exposure. Information on how these values are calculated is limited and knowing how displayed MGD values compare and correlate to conventional Monte-Carlo-based methods is useful. From measurements done on polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms, it has been shown that displayed and calculated MGD values are similar for thin to medium thicknesses and appear to differ with larger PMMA thicknesses. As a result, a multiple linear regression analysis on the data was performed to generate models by which displayed MGD values on the two FFDM units included in the study may be converted to the Monte-Carlo values calculated by conventional methods. These models should be a useful tool for medical physicists requiring MGD data from FFDM units included in this paper and should reduce the survey time spent on dose calculations. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs167

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Journal Volume
154
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 217-228
ISSN
0144-8420

Optional Information

Notes
14 refs