Follow-up MRI in multiple sclerosis patients: automated co-registration and lesion color-coding improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces reading time
Creators
- 1. Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne (Germany)
- 2. Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (United States)
- 3. Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (United States)
Description
In multiple sclerosis (MS), the heterogeneous and numerous appearances of lesions may impair diagnostic accuracy. This study investigates if a combined automated co-registration and lesion color-coding method (AC) improves assessment of MS follow-up MRI compared with conventional reading (CR). We retrospectively assessed 70 follow-up MRI of 53 patients. Heterogeneous datasets of diverse scanners and institutions were used. Two readers determined presence of (a) progression, (b) regression, (c) mixed change, or (d) stable disease between the two examinations using corresponding FLAIR sequences in CR and AC-assisted reading. Consensus reference reading was provided by two blinded radiologists. Kappa statistics tested interrater agreement, McNemar's test dichotomous variables, and Wilcoxon's test continuous variables (statistical significance p ≤ 0.05). The cohort comprised 41 female and 12 male patients with a mean age of 40 (± 14) years. Average rating time was reduced from 78 (± 36) to 44 (±22) s with the AC approach (p < 0.001). The time needed to start and match datasets with AC was 14 (± 1) s. Compared with CR, AC improved interrater agreement, both between raters (0.52 vs. 0.67) and between raters and consensus reference reading (0.47/0.5 vs. 0.83/0.78). Compared with CR, the diagnostic accuracy increased from 67 to 90% (reader 1, p < 0.01) and from 70 to 87% (reader 2, p < 0.05) in the AC-assisted reading. Compared with CR, automated co-registration and lesion color-coding of MS-associated FLAIR-lesions in follow-up MRI increased diagnostic accuracy and reduced the time required for follow-up evaluation significantly. The AC algorithm therefore appears to be helpful to improve MS follow-up assessments in clinical routine.
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06273-xAdditional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 29
- Journal Issue
- 12
- Journal Page Range
- p. 7047-7054
- ISSN
- 0938-7994
- CODEN
- EURAE3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 51036162
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; NMR IMAGING; RELAXATION TIME; TRAINING; WEIGHTING FUNCTIONS
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; NERVOUS SYSTEM; ORGANS; PROCESSING