Published November 15, 2007 | Version v1
Journal article

Anatomic Boundaries of the Clinical Target Volume (Prostate Bed) After Radical Prostatectomy

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, St. Leonards, Sydney, New South Wales (Australia)
  • 2. Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario (Canada)
  • 3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario (Canada)
  • 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich (Switzerland)
  • 5. Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales (Australia)

Description

Purpose: We sought to derive and validate an interdisciplinary consensus definition for the anatomic boundaries of the postoperative clinical target volume (CTV, prostate bed). Methods and Materials: Thirty one patients who had planned for radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy were enrolled and underwent computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) simulation prior to radiotherapy. Through an iterative process of consultation and discussion, an interdisciplinary consensus definition was derived based on a review of published data, patterns of local failure, surgical practice, and radiologic anatomy. In validation, we analyzed the distribution of surgical clips in reference to the consensus CTV and measured spatial uncertainties in delineating the CTV and vesicourethral anastomosis. Clinical radiotherapy plans were retrospectively evaluated against the consensus CTV (prostate bed). Results: Anatomic boundaries of the consensus CTV (prostate bed) are described. Surgical clips (n = 339) were well distributed throughout the CTV. The vesicourethral anastomosis was accurately localized using central sagittal computed tomography reconstruction, with a mean ± standard deviation uncertainty of 1.8 ± 2.5 mm. Delineation uncertainties were small for both MRI and computed tomography (mean reproducibility, 0-3.8 mm; standard deviation, 1.0-2.3); they were most pronounced in the anteroposterior and superoinferior dimensions and at the superior/posterior-most aspect of the CTV. Retrospectively, the mean ± standard deviation CTV (prostate bed) percentage of volume receiving 100% of prescribed dose was only 77% ± 26%. Conclusions: We propose anatomic boundaries for the CTV (prostate bed) and present evidence supporting its validity. In the absence of gross recurrence, the role of MRI in delineating the CTV remains to be confirmed. The CTV is larger than historically practiced at our institution and should be encompassed by a microscopic tumoricidal dose

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.068

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.068;
PII
S0360-3016(07)00792-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
69
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 1090-1099
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
39059620
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ANATOMY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ITERATIVE METHODS; NMR IMAGING; PATIENTS; PROSTATE; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY; REVIEWS; SURGERY; VALIDATION
Descriptors DEC
BIOLOGY; BODY; CALCULATION METHODS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DOCUMENT TYPES; DOSES; GLANDS; MALE GENITALS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; TESTING; THERAPY; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2007 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, All rights reserved.