Published July 2003 | Version v1
Journal article

Research misconduct

Description

Good research practice is important to the scientific community. An awareness of what constitutes poor practice is important. Various types of research misconduct are defined in this article. The extent of research misconduct in the field of radiology has been assessed by contacting five English language radiology journals. Redundant or duplicate publication has been reported infrequently, Radiology (1), American Journal of Roentgenology (3), Clinical Radiology (3), British Journal of Radiology (2) and European Radiology (1). The issue of how the radiology community might tackle research misconduct is discussed with reference to guidance from the Medical Research Council, the Wellcome Trust and the Committee of Publication Ethics

Additional details

Identifiers

PII
S0009926003001764;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Clinical Radiology
Journal Volume
58
Journal Issue
7
Journal Page Range
p. 499-504
ISSN
0009-9260
CODEN
CLRAAG

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
35010148
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ETHICAL ASPECTS; FRAUD; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOBIOLOGY
Descriptors DEC
BIOLOGY; CRIME; MEDICINE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.