Published July 2003
| Version v1
Journal article
Research misconduct
Creators
Description
Good research practice is important to the scientific community. An awareness of what constitutes poor practice is important. Various types of research misconduct are defined in this article. The extent of research misconduct in the field of radiology has been assessed by contacting five English language radiology journals. Redundant or duplicate publication has been reported infrequently, Radiology (1), American Journal of Roentgenology (3), Clinical Radiology (3), British Journal of Radiology (2) and European Radiology (1). The issue of how the radiology community might tackle research misconduct is discussed with reference to guidance from the Medical Research Council, the Wellcome Trust and the Committee of Publication Ethics
Additional details
Identifiers
- PII
- S0009926003001764;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Clinical Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 58
- Journal Issue
- 7
- Journal Page Range
- p. 499-504
- ISSN
- 0009-9260
- CODEN
- CLRAAG
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 35010148
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ETHICAL ASPECTS; FRAUD; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOBIOLOGY
- Descriptors DEC
- BIOLOGY; CRIME; MEDICINE
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.