Nuclear wastes: end product or just the end
Creators
Description
Until the nuclear fuel cycle is closed, nuclear power plants will operate at an economic disadvantage relative to fossil-fuel plants. Although eight new reprocessing plants for spent fuel are needed by 1980 to deal with the wastes that are accumulating, public reaction to nuclear wastes and the threat of plutonium proliferation has halted this portion of the cycle and required expanded storage facilities. ERDA expects to have a way to package wastes by 1978, but is still looking for an acceptable place for permanent storage. Public concerns center on the fear that levels of radioactivity will affect present and future generations and the fear that some plutonium will be diverted for use in weapons. These fears are examined and not found to be warranted as long as zero radiation and total safeguards are not the required goal
Additional details
Additional titles
- Augmented title (English)
- Economic and social impacts of fuel cycle
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy (Stamford, Conn.)
- Journal Volume
- 2
- Journal Issue
- 2
- Series
- Energy (Stamford, Conn.).
- Journal Page Range
- 9-11
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 8338411
- Subject category
- S12: MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES;
- Descriptors DEI
- ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FUEL CYCLE; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; NUCLEAR MATERIALS DIVERSION; NUCLEAR MATERIALS MANAGEMENT; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PLUTONIUM; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RADIATION HAZARDS; RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROCESSING; REGULATIONS; RELIABILITY; REPROCESSING; SAFEGUARDS; SECURITY; WASTE STORAGE
- Descriptors DEC
- ACTINIDES; ELEMENTS; HAZARDS; HEALTH HAZARDS; INDUSTRY; LAW; MANAGEMENT; METALS; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; SEPARATION PROCESSES; STORAGE; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; TRANSURANIUM ELEMENTS; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE PROCESSING