Published January 1977 | Version v1
Journal article

Nuclear wastes: end product or just the end

Creators

Description

Until the nuclear fuel cycle is closed, nuclear power plants will operate at an economic disadvantage relative to fossil-fuel plants. Although eight new reprocessing plants for spent fuel are needed by 1980 to deal with the wastes that are accumulating, public reaction to nuclear wastes and the threat of plutonium proliferation has halted this portion of the cycle and required expanded storage facilities. ERDA expects to have a way to package wastes by 1978, but is still looking for an acceptable place for permanent storage. Public concerns center on the fear that levels of radioactivity will affect present and future generations and the fear that some plutonium will be diverted for use in weapons. These fears are examined and not found to be warranted as long as zero radiation and total safeguards are not the required goal

Additional details

Additional titles

Augmented title (English)
Economic and social impacts of fuel cycle

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy (Stamford, Conn.)
Journal Volume
2
Journal Issue
2
Series
Energy (Stamford, Conn.).
Journal Page Range
9-11