Published May 10, 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparison between Numerical Simulations and Experimental Results on Copper Deposition in Rotating Cylinder Hull Cell

  • 1. Department of Nuclear Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 151-742 (Korea, Republic of)
  • 2. School of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, UNIST-gil 50, UNIST, Ulsan, 689-798 (Korea, Republic of)
  • 3. Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Idaho-Idaho Falls, Center for Advanced Energy Studies, 995 University Blvd, Idaho Falls, ID 83401 (United States)
  • 4. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 1045 Daedeok-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-353 (Korea, Republic of)
  • 5. Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, 401 West Main Street, Richmond, VA, 23284 (United States)
  • 6. Department of Metallurgical Engineering, University of Utah, 201 Presidents Cir, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • 2D and 3D numerical models were developed for modeling metal electrodeposition. • Experiments on Cu deposition were conducted in a rotating cylindrical Hull cell. • Current and potential distributions were simulated along the cathode. • Calculated potential distributions were validated with experimentally measured data. • Current density distributions calculated by 2D and 3D models were compared. - Abstract: 2D and 3D numerical models for electrorefining used in pyroprocessing have been developed by Seoul National University with the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute and University of Idaho with the Idaho National Laboratory, respectively. To validate these models, numerical simulations are conducted on a rotating cylindrical Hull cell for copper deposition in a sulfuric acid solution. The primary current density distribution along the cathode is compared to an empirical equation of Madore. The 2D and 3D modeling results of the tertiary current density distribution along the cathode were compared. The numerical modeling results of the 2D and 3D models match each other well. In addition, the modeling results of the 3D model on the tertiary current density distributions according to the applied current densities are compared to the experimentally measured distributions. There are some discrepancies between the modeling results and experimental data. The discrepancies could be mainly explained by the hydrodynamic effect of Luggin probes used for measuring the overpotential distribution. At low Reynolds number, Luggin probes could act as a static mixer improving mass transfer near working electrode. In contrast, at high Reynolds number, Luggin probes could act as a flow obstacle dissipating flow kinetic energy

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.160

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.160;
PII
S0013-4686(15)00468-5;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Electrochimica Acta
Journal Volume
164
Journal Page Range
p. 218-226
ISSN
0013-4686
CODEN
ELCAAV

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.