Published March 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

A decision model for intergenerational life-cycle risk assessment of civil infrastructure exposed to hurricanes under climate change

  • 1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (United States)
  • 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 (United States)

Description

Public awareness of civil infrastructure performance has increased considerably in recent years as a result of repeated natural disasters. Risks from natural hazards may increase dramatically in the future, given current patterns of urbanization and population growth in hazard-prone areas. Risk assessments for infrastructure with expected service periods of a century or more are highly uncertain, and there is compelling evidence that climatology will evolve over such intervals. Thus, current natural hazard and risk assessment models, which are based on a presumption of stationarity in hazard occurrence and intensity, may not be adequate to assess the potential risks from hazards occurring in the distant future. This paper addresses two significant intergenerational elements – the potential impact of non-stationarity in hazard due to climate change and intergenerational discounting practices – that are essential to provide an improved decision support framework that accommodates the needs and values of future generations. The framework so developed is tested through two benchmark problems involving buildings exposed to hurricanes. - Highlights: • Difficulties of conventional life-cycle engineering decision-making over multiple generations are clearly elaborated. • Two intergenerational elements are proposed to reflect equitable allocations of risk between generations. • A data-based approach to forecast future hurricanes is provided to bridge the gap between models at large and local scales. • The feasibility and practicability of a refined framework are examined through two lifecycle cost assessment examples. • The two intergenerational elements suggested in this study have a wide range of applicability.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.022

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.022;
PII
S0951-8320(16)30725-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Journal Volume
159
Journal Page Range
p. 100-107
ISSN
0951-8320
CODEN
RESSEP

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
48064673
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
ALLOCATIONS; BENCHMARKS; BUILDINGS; CLIMATIC CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; ENGINEERING; HURRICANES; LIFE CYCLE; NATURAL DISASTERS; PERFORMANCE; POPULATIONS; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT
Descriptors DEC
STORMS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.