Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis of an integrated solar gas turbine/combined cycle power plant
- 1. Università degli Studi di Firenze, Department of Industrial Engineering, Viale G.B. Morgagni 40, Firenze, 50134 (Italy)
- 2. Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics, German Aerospace Center, Pfaffenwaldring 38-40, Stuttgart, 70569 (Germany)
- 3. Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Thermal Technology, Konarskiego 22, Gliwice, 44-100 (Poland)
Description
Highlights: • Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis of CCGT and ISCCGT is performed. • Integrating solar energy to CCGT helps save fuel and boosts the power output. • The CO2 emission factor in ISCCGT is decreased from 346 to 315 gCO2-Eq/kWh. • The solar hybridization increases the capital costs by 48%. • ISCCGT technology might be also reasonable in regions of poor solar radiation. Integration of solar power to Combined Cycle Power Plants is a solution attracting increasing interest, bridging solar thermal technology to a well-proven energy conversion solution. The integration is attractive for countries aiming to pass to natural gas as an energy feedstock and it could improve the environmental performance. In order to identify the performance and potential environmental benefits, a model of the plant was applied. It covered an annual operation period and included the effects of surroundings variables. The model allows to predict the power plant performance, and calculates a complete exergy balance for all the components of the complex plant. The calculations are repeated for referential CCGT and for the Integrated Solar CCGT. A complete exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental model was applied at the design conditions after evaluating the cost of equipment and their environmental score using a detailed Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) modelling tool. The results, applied to a power plant in Southern Poland, show that the solution can be attractive for improving the environmental performance of a CCGT (CO2 emission factor decreased by 9%), and that the capital cost is only slightly increased so that the rate of return of the investment is only marginally affected.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.080Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.080;
- PII
- S0360544218309009;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy (Oxford)
- Journal Volume
- 156
- Journal Page Range
- p. 352-359
- ISSN
- 0360-5442
- CODEN
- ENEYDS
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 53000885
- Subject category
- S14: SOLAR ENERGY; S42: ENGINEERING;
- Descriptors DEI
- CAPITALIZED COST; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMBINED-CYCLE POWER PLANTS; ENERGY ANALYSIS; ENERGY CONVERSION; EXERGY; GAS TURBINES; INVESTMENT; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; NATURAL GAS; POLAND; SIMULATION; SOLAR ENERGY; SOLAR RADIATION
- Descriptors DEC
- CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; CONVERSION; COST; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; EASTERN EUROPE; ENERGY; ENERGY SOURCES; EQUIPMENT; EUROPE; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; MACHINERY; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; POWER PLANTS; RADIATIONS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; STELLAR RADIATION; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; TURBINES; TURBOMACHINERY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.