Experimental evidence of population differences in reproductive investment conditional on environmental stochasticity
Creators
- 1. Univ Pau & Pays Adour, UMR 1224, Ecologie Comportementale et Biologie des Populations de Poissons, UFR Sciences et Techniques de la Côte Basque, Allée du parc Montaury, 64600 Anglet (France)
- 2. INRA, UMR 1224, Ecologie Comportementale et Biologie des Populations de Poissons, Aquapôle, quartier Ibarron, 64310 Saint-Pée sur Nivelle (France)
- 3. INRA, UR 107, Nutrition Metabolism Aquaculture, Aquapôle, 64310 Saint Pée sur Nivelle (France)
- 4. Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48080 Bilbao (Spain)
Description
Environmental stochasticity is expected to shape life histories of species, wherein organisms subjected to strong environmental variation should display adaptive response by being able to tune their reproductive investment. For riverine ecosystems, climate models forecast an increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme events such as floods and droughts. The speed and the mechanisms by which organisms may adapt their reproductive investment are therefore of primary importance to understand how species will cope with such radical environmental changes. In the present study, we sampled spawners from two different populations of wild brown trout, originating from two environments with contrasting levels of flow stochasticity. We placed them in sympatry within an experimental channel during reproductive season. In one modality, water flow was maintained constant, whereas in another modality, water flow was highly variable. Reproductive investment of all individuals was monitored using weight and energetic plasma metabolite variation throughout the reproductive season. Only the populations originating from the most variable environment showed a plastic response to experimental manipulation of water flow, the females being able to reduce their weight variation (from 19.2% to 13.1%) and metabolites variations (from 84.2% to 18.6% for triglycerides for instance) under variable flow conditions. These results imply that mechanisms to cope with environmental stochasticity can differ between populations of the same species, where some populations can be plastic whereas other cannot. - Highlights: • We place two populations of brown trout under contrasting water flow for reproduction. • Energetic metabolite variation is used as a cue of reproductive investment. • In constant flow, both populations show the same reproductive investment. • In variable flow, only one of the populations modifies its reproductive investment. • Divergent evolution of reproductive investment is expected under hydrological change.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.069Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.069;
- PII
- S0048-9697(15)30729-4;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Science of the Total Environment
- Journal Volume
- 541
- Journal Page Range
- p. 143-148
- ISSN
- 0048-9697
- CODEN
- STENDL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48010974
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- CLIMATE MODELS; CLIMATES; CLIMATIC CHANGE; DROUGHTS; ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FEMALES; FLOODS; INVESTMENT; METABOLITES; POPULATIONS; REPRODUCTION; SEASONS; TRIGLYCERIDES; TROUT; VARIATIONS; WATER
- Descriptors DEC
- ANIMALS; AQUATIC ORGANISMS; ESTERS; FISHES; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; LIPIDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; VERTEBRATES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.