Published September 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparing unloading compliance and d-c EP technique during SENT testing

Description

Several procedures for SENT testing (DNV, ExxonMobil, and CANMET) are currently used in the industry and more recently a British Standard (BS8571:2014) has been published. In these procedures, either the d-c EP method or the unloading compliance technique are used to determine the start of ductile tearing and crack growth to arrive at fracture resistance CTOD R and J-R curves. This paper compares crack growth predictions where both the unloading compliance and d-c EP techniques were used simultaneously during SENT tests. Other unique aspects of the comparative methodologies, pros and cons of each of the two methods, and guidelines for fracture resistance curve development from SENT testing are also discussed.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2017.07.006

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijpvp.2017.07.006;
PII
S0308-0161(17)30037-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
Journal Volume
156
Journal Page Range
p. 79-88
ISSN
0308-0161
CODEN
PRVPAS

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49087685
Subject category
S12: MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES; S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
COMPLIANCE; CRACK PROPAGATION; TESTING; UNITED KINGDOM; UNLOADING
Descriptors DEC
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; EUROPE; MATERIALS HANDLING; WESTERN EUROPE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.