LSQ14bdq: A type Ic super-luminous supernova with a double-peaked light curve
Creators
- 1. Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queens University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN (United Kingdom)
- 2. European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Coŕdova 3107, Vitacura, Santiago (Chile)
- 3. Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8121 (United States)
- 4. INAF—Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova (Italy)
- 5. Institute of Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 (United States)
- 6. Institut für Physik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Newtonstr. 15, D-12489 Berlin (Germany)
- 7. Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA (United Kingdom)
- 8. Benoziyo Center for Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100 (Israel)
- 9. Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Vicuña Mackenna 4860, 7820436 Macul, Santiago (Chile)
- 10. Tuorla Observatory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, Väisäläntie 20, FI-21500 Piikkiö (Finland)
Description
We present data for LSQ14bdq, a hydrogen-poor super-luminous supernova (SLSN) discovered by the La Silla QUEST survey and classified by the Public ESO Spectroscopic Survey of Transient Objects. The spectrum and light curve are very similar to slow-declining SLSNe such as PTF12dam. However, detections within ∼1 day after explosion show a bright and relatively fast initial peak, lasting for ∼15 days, prior to the usual slow rise to maximum light. The broader, main peak can be fit with either central engine or circumstellar interaction models. We discuss the implications of the precursor peak in the context of these models. It is too bright and narrow to be explained as a normal 56Ni-powered SN, and we suggest that interaction models may struggle to fit the two peaks simultaneously. We propose that the initial peak may arise from the post-shock cooling of extended stellar material, and reheating by a central engine drives the second peak. In this picture, we show that an explosion energy of erg and a progenitor radius of a few hundred solar radii would be required to power the early emission. The competing engine models involve rapidly spinning magnetars (neutron stars) or fallback onto a central black hole. The prompt energy required may favor the black hole scenario. The bright initial peak may be difficult to reconcile with a compact Wolf–Rayet star as a progenitor since the inferred energies and ejected masses become unphysical.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/807/1/L18Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Astrophysical Journal Letters
- Journal Volume
- 807
- Journal Issue
- 1
- Journal Page Range
- [6 p.]
- ISSN
- 2041-8205
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 51039830
- Subject category
- S79: ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- BLACK HOLES; COMPACTS; EMISSION; HYDROGEN; INTERACTIONS; MASS; NEUTRON STARS; NICKEL 56; PRECURSOR; SPECTRA; TYPE I SUPERNOVAE
- Descriptors DEC
- BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; BETA-PLUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; BINARY STARS; DAYS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES; ELECTRON CAPTURE RADIOISOTOPES; ELEMENTS; ERUPTIVE VARIABLE STARS; EVEN-EVEN NUCLEI; INTERMEDIATE MASS NUCLEI; ISOTOPES; NICKEL ISOTOPES; NONMETALS; NUCLEI; RADIOISOTOPES; STARS; SUPERNOVAE; VARIABLE STARS