Published 1984
| Version v1
Report
Open
INTOR critical issue D: maintainability. Tritium containment and personnel access vs remote maintenance, Chapter VI of the US INTOR report for Phase Two A, Part 2
Description
The purpose of this study is to compare the benefits and costs associated with personnel access mmaintenance procedures compared to those of all-remote maintenance procedures. The INTOR Phase Two A, Part I configuration was used to make this comparison. For both approaches, capital and operating costs were considered to first order, maintenance equipment requirements were investigated, maintenance requirements common to both approaches and unique to each were identified, tritium handling requirements were outlined, and maintenance scenarios and device downtime were developed for both. In addition, estimates of person-rem exposure were made for the personnel access approach
Availability note (English)
MF available from INIS under the Report Number; Available from NTIS, PC A08/MF A01; 1 as DE85002484.Files
16047973.pdf
Files
(3.0 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:7977dfd69a2ffae266157d3ea61ef8c3
|
3.0 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Imprint Pagination
- 163 p.
- Report number
- CONF-8410187--1
Conference
- Title
- INTOR workshop.
- Dates
- 25-29 Oct 1984.
- Place
- Vienna (Austria).
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 16047973
- Subject category
- S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- CONTAINMENT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; INTOR TOKAMAK; MAINTENANCE; PERSONNEL; RADIATION HAZARDS; REMOTE HANDLING; TRITIUM
- Descriptors DEC
- BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; BETA-MINUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; CLOSED PLASMA DEVICES; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; HAZARDS; HEALTH HAZARDS; HYDROGEN ISOTOPES; ISOTOPES; LIGHT NUCLEI; NUCLEI; ODD-EVEN NUCLEI; RADIOISOTOPES; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES; TOKAMAK DEVICES; YEARS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES