Comparison of Two Methods for Dose Distribution Calculation of Multi-unit Site
- 1. Sejong University, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
- 2. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon (Korea, Republic of)
Description
In the risk assessment of multi-unit nuclear power plants (NPPs) in a single site, the realistic dose distribution calculation is a significant issue. So far, probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) analysts have been using the single location method that integrates all NPPs into one virtual NPP and the dose distribution calculation is once performed for the virtual NPP. This may result in quite different dose distribution from the reality. They are center-of-mass (COM) dose calculation method and multiple-location (ML) dose calculation method. In order to investigate the uncertainty of dose calculation methods for multi-unit NPPs in a site, the two dose distribution calculation methods of COM and ML methods are compared in this study. This study is summarized as ML method is recommended for equivalent dose calculation for general population distribution cases. COM method drastically overestimated or underestimated for general population distribution cases. COM method may result in quite different dose distribution from the reality.
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Publisher
- KNS
- Imprint Place
- Daejeon (Korea, Republic of)
- Imprint Title
- Proceedings of the KNS 2017 Fall Meeting
- Imprint Pagination
- [1 CD-ROM]
- Journal Page Range
- [3 p.]
Conference
- Title
- 2017 Fall Meeting of the KNS
- Dates
- 25-27 Oct 2017
- Place
- Kyungju (Korea, Republic of)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Korea, Republic of
- Country of Input or Organization
- Korea, Republic of
- INIS RN
- 49079084
- Subject category
- S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference, Non-conventional Literature
- Descriptors DEI
- COMPUTER CALCULATIONS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PERFORMANCE; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY ANALYSIS
- Descriptors DEC
- NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS
Optional Information
- Notes
- 5 refs, 5 figs, 3 tabs