Published August 2008 | Version v1
Journal article

Photodynamic dose does not correlate with long-term tumor response to mTHPC-PDT performed at several drug-light intervals

  • 1. Departments of Physics and Astronomy and of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 648, Rochester, New York 14642 (United States)
  • 2. Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 648, Rochester, New York 14642 (United States)
  • 3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 648, Rochester, New York 14627 (United States)

Description

Meso-tetra-hydroxyphenyl-chlorin (mTHPC, Foscan registered ), a promising photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy (PDT), is approved in Europe for the palliative treatment of head and neck cancer. Based on work in mice that investigated optimal tumor accumulation, clinical protocols with Foscan registered typically employ an interval of 96 h between systemic sensitizer administration and irradiation. However, recent studies in mouse tumor models have demonstrated significantly improved long-term tumor response when irradiation is performed at shorter drug-light intervals of 3 and 6 h. Using a previously published theoretical model of microscopic PDT dosimetry and informed by experimentally determined photophysical properties and intratumor sensitizer concentrations and distributions, we calculated photodynamic dose depositions following mTHPC-PDT for drug-light intervals of 3, 6, 24, and 96 h. Our results demonstrate that the singlet oxygen dose to the tumor volume does not track even qualitatively with tumor responses for these four drug-light intervals. Further, microscopic analysis of simulated singlet oxygen deposition shows that in no case do any subpopulations of tumor cells receive a threshold dose. Indeed, under the conditions of these simulations more than 90% of the tumor volume receives a dose that is approximately 20-fold lower than the threshold dose for mTHPC. Thus, in this evaluation of mTHPC-PDT at various drug-light intervals, any PDT dose metric that is proportional to singlet oxygen creation and/or deposition would fail to predict the tumor response. In situations like this one, other reporters of biological response to therapy would be necessary

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Medical Physics
Journal Volume
35
Journal Issue
8
Journal Page Range
p. 3518-3526
ISSN
0094-2405
CODEN
MPHYA6

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
40003398
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BIOPHYSICS; DOSIMETRY; DRUGS; IRRADIATION; MICE; NEOPLASMS; RADIOTHERAPY; SENSITIZERS; SIMULATION; THRESHOLD DOSE; TUMOR CELLS
Descriptors DEC
ANIMAL CELLS; ANIMALS; DISEASES; DOSES; MAMMALS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PHYSICS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOLOGY; REAGENTS; RODENTS; THERAPY; VERTEBRATES

Optional Information

Notes
(c) 2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine