Variation in use of targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results from a Dutch population-based registry
Creators
- 1. Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam (Netherlands)
- 2. Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam (Netherlands)
- 3. Department of Urology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (Netherlands)
- 4. Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
- 5. Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (Netherlands)
Description
For patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), targeted therapies have entered the market since 2006. The aims of this study were to evaluate the uptake and use of targeted therapies for mRCC in The Netherlands, examine factors associated with the prescription of targeted therapies in daily clinical practice and study their effectiveness in terms of overall survival (OS). Two cohorts from PERCEPTION, a population-based registry of mRCC patients, were used: a 2008–2010 Cohort (n = 645) and a 2011–2013 Cohort (n = 233). Chi-squared tests for trend were used to study time trends in the use of targeted therapy. Patients were grouped based on the eligibility criteria of the SUTENT trial, the trial that led to sunitinib becoming standard of care, to investigate the use of targeted therapies amongst patients fulfilling those criteria. Multi-level logistic regression was used to identify patient subgroups that are less likely to receive targeted therapies. Approximately one-third of patients fulfilling SUTENT trial eligibility criteria did not receive any targeted therapy (29 % in the 2008–2010 Cohort; 35 % in the 2011–2013 Cohort). Patients aged 65+ years were less likely to receive targeted therapy in both cohorts and different risk groups (odds ratios range between 0.84–0.92); other factors like number of metastatic sites were of influence in some subgroups. Amongst treated patients, there was a decreasing trend in sunitinib use over time (p = 0.0061), and an increasing trend in pazopanib use (p = 0.0005). Targeted therapies have largely replaced interferon-alfa as first-line standard of care. Nevertheless, many eligible patients in Dutch daily practice did not receive targeted therapies despite their ability to improve survival. Reasons for their apparent underutilisation should be examined more carefully. The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2395-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2395-x; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4902930Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- BMC cancer (Online)
- Journal Volume
- 16
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 1471-2407
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 47088107
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARCINOMAS; KIDNEYS; METASTASES; PATIENTS; THERAPY
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; DISEASES; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; ORGANS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) The Author(s). 2016
- Notes
- PMCID: PMC4902930; PMID: 27286871; PUBLISHER-ID: 2395; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4902930