Published February 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Understanding the timing and variation of greenhouse gas emissions of forest bioenergy systems

  • 1. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Research Centre on Renewable Materials, Department of Wood and Forest Sciences, Laval University, Quebec City, Qc, G1V 0A6 (Canada)
  • 3. CETEMAS, Forest and Wood Technology Research Centre, Sustainable Forest Management Area, Pumarabule S/n, 33936, Asturias (Spain)
  • 4. Centre for Forest Research, P.O. box 8888, Centre-ville Station, Montréal, Qc, H3C 3P8 (Canada)

Description

Highlights: • Net GHG balance shows GHG reduction potential of forest bioenergy is limited. • Results are dependent on methods, system boundaries and reference system. • Mitigation potential depends on forest management and whole forest product basket. • Multi-level governance framework require to track wider impacts of forest bioenergy. -- Abstract: Forest-based bioenergy plays an important role in climate mitigation for limiting global mean temperature increase to below 2 °C. The greenhouse gas (GHG) impact of three forest-based bioenergy systems from the USA, Canada and Spain supplying wood pellets for electricity in the UK were evaluated by conducting lifecycle assessments and forest carbon modelling of the three forest systems. Cumulative emissions were analysed by calculating the forest carbon stock change and net GHG emissions balance of the forest-based bioenergy electricity. The analysis considered both the replacement of the existing electricity mix with bioenergy electricity and forest management with and without bioenergy use. The supply chain emissions and forest carbon balances indicated that GHG emission reductions are possible. However, the cumulative net GHG balance at forest landscape scale revealed that the reduction potential is limited, potentially with no GHG reductions in fast growing forests with shorter rotations, while slow growing forest systems with longer rotations result in greater GHG reductions. This means that the maximum climate benefit is delivered at a different point in time for different forest systems. To evaluate the climate change mitigation potential of forest-based bioenergy it is therefore necessary to consider the management, utilisation and relevant counterfactual of the whole forest and its products. In terms of climate change mitigation potential and minimising possible negative impacts that would require multi-level governance.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.12.019;
PII
S0961953418303532;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Biomass and Bioenergy
Journal Volume
121
Journal Page Range
p. 99-114
ISSN
0961-9534
CODEN
BMSBEO

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.