Published October 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Ten years after entry into force of the Stockholm Convention: What do air monitoring data tell about its effectiveness?

  • 1. Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1, 8093 Zürich (Switzerland)
  • 2. Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX), Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, Pavillion A29, 625 00 Brno (Czech Republic)
  • 3. Institute for Sustainability Sciences ISS, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zürich (Switzerland)
  • 4. Air Quality Processes Research Section, Environment and Climate Change Canada, 4905 Dufferin Street, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4 (Canada)
  • 5. School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, 702 Walnut Grove Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47405 (United States)
  • 6. Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU) at FRAM – High North Research Centre on Climate and the Environment, 9296 Tromsø (Norway)

Description

More than a decade ago, the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), one of the multilateral environmental agreements administered by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), entered into force. The objective of this Convention is to protect human health and the environment by controlling the releases of POPs. According to its Article 16, the effectiveness of the Stockholm Convention shall be evaluated using comparable monitoring data on the presence of POPs as well as their regional and global environmental transport. Here, we present a time series analysis on atmospheric POP concentrations from 15 monitoring stations in North America and Europe that provide long-term data and have started operations between 1990 and 2003. We systematically searched for temporal trends and significant structural changes in temporal trends that might result from the provisions of the Stockholm Convention. We find that such structural changes do occur, but they are related mostly to effects of national regulations enforced prior to the implementation of the Stockholm Convention, rather than to the enforcement of the provisions laid out in the Convention. One example is that concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls, many of which started to decrease rapidly during the 1990s. Also effects of chemical transport and fate, for instance the re-volatilization of POPs from secondary sources, are thought to be a cause of some of the observed structural changes. We conclude that a decade of air monitoring data has not been sufficient for detecting general and statistically significant effects of the Stockholm Convention. Based on these lessons, we present recommendations for the future operation of existing monitoring programs and advocate for a stricter enforcement of the provisions of the Stockholm Convention, in the current absence of proof for its effectiveness. - Highlights: • We analyze time series on persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in ambient air. • We contribute to the effectiveness evaluation of the Stockholm Convention on POPs. • Structural breaks were identified in the time series, applying Chow's test. • National regulations and voluntary restrictions have affected POP concentrations. • More monitoring data are needed to prove the Stockholm Convention's effectiveness. - Atmospheric monitoring data on persistent organic pollutants reveal the impacts of earlier national regulations, but cannot yet show the expected effects of the Stockholm Convention.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.090

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.090;
PII
S0269-7491(16)30090-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Pollution (1987)
Journal Volume
217
Journal Page Range
p. 149-158
ISSN
0269-7491
CODEN
ENPOEK

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.