Spatial lifecycles of cleantech industries – The global development history of solar photovoltaics
Creators
- 1. Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy - CIRCLE, Lund University, Lund (Sweden)
- 2. Askew School of Public Administration and Policy, Florida State University, FL (United States)
- 3. The World Bank, Washington, DC (United States)
Description
New industries develop in increasingly globalized networks, whose dynamics are not well understood by academia and policy making. Solar photovoltaics (PV) are a case in point for an industry that experienced several shifts in its spatial organization over a short period of time. A lively debate has recently emerged on whether the spatial dynamics in new cleantech sectors are in line with existing industry lifecycle models or whether globalization created new lifecycle patterns that are not fully explained in the literature. This paper addresses this question based on an extensive analysis of quantitative data in the solar PV sector. Comprehensive global databases containing 86,000 patents as well as manufacturing and sales records are used to analyze geographic shifts in the PV sector's innovation, manufacturing and market deployment activities between 1990 and 2012. The analysis reveals spatial lifecycle patterns with lower-than-expected first mover advantages in manufacturing and market activities and an earlier entry of firms from emerging economies in manufacturing and knowledge creation. We discuss implications of these findings for the competitive positions of companies in developed and emerging economies, derive new stylized hypotheses for industry lifecycle theories, and sketch policy approaches that are reflexive of global interdependencies in emerging cleantech industries. - Highlights: • The global spatial lifecycle of the solar photovoltaic (PV) industry is analyzed. • Our data partly contradicts existing industry lifecycle theories. • Latecomers in China started manufacturing and deployment earlier than expected. • Pioneers in the US and EU retained significant first-mover advantages in patenting. • Industry lifecycle theory needs updates in the production and market dimensions.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.034Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.034;
- PII
- S0301-4215(16)30583-3;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 101
- Journal Page Range
- p. 386-402
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48085313
- Subject category
- S14: SOLAR ENERGY; S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- CHINA; ECONOMY; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GLOBALIZATION; MANUFACTURING; MARKET; PATENTS; PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SUPPLIES; SALES; SOLAR CELLS
- Descriptors DEC
- ASIA; DIRECT ENERGY CONVERTERS; DOCUMENT TYPES; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; PHOTOELECTRIC CELLS; PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS; POWER SUPPLIES; SOLAR EQUIPMENT
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.