Published July 15, 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

Efficacy of Sunitinib and Radiotherapy in Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

  • 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 2. Center for Molecular Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 3. Harvard-Partners Center for Genetics and Genomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 4. Vascular Biology Program and Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 5. Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 6. Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 7. Center for Cancer Research, Department of Biology, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA (United States)

Description

Purpose: Sunitinib (SU) is a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. The present study examined SU and radiotherapy (RT) in a genetically engineered mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Methods and Materials: Primary extremity STSs were generated in genetically engineered mice. The mice were randomized to treatment with SU, RT (10 Gy x 2), or both (SU+RT). Changes in the tumor vasculature before and after treatment were assessed in vivo using fluorescence-mediated tomography. The control and treated tumors were harvested and extensively analyzed. Results: The mean fluorescence in the tumors was not decreased by RT but decreased 38-44% in tumors treated with SU or SU+RT. The control tumors grew to a mean of 1378 mm3 after 12 days. SU alone or RT alone delayed tumor growth by 56% and 41%, respectively, but maximal growth inhibition (71%) was observed with the combination therapy. SU target effects were confirmed by loss of target receptor phosphorylation and alterations in SU-related gene expression. Cancer cell proliferation was decreased and apoptosis increased in the SU and RT groups, with a synergistic effect on apoptosis observed in the SU+RT group. RT had a minimal effect on the tumor microvessel density and endothelial cell-specific apoptosis, but SU alone or SU+RT decreased the microvessel density by >66% and induced significant endothelial cell apoptosis. Conclusion: SU inhibited STS growth by effects on both cancer cells and tumor vasculature. SU also augmented the efficacy of RT, suggesting that this combination strategy could improve local control of STS.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.052

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.052;
PII
S0360-3016(09)00350-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
74
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 1207-1216
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.